• tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      A seperate bubble compartment for the kids, and offroad tires. I mean, I’d buy it. Though $82,000 is still a steep price for a car, even now.

  • Raxiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t get it, because I can’t see enough of the car behind that dumpster to understand the point

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s the car Bladerunner would drive. You know, Bladerunner, from Bladerunner. By Ridleyscott.

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      You know, the original book isn’t even called “Bladerunner.” It’s called “Do Bladerunners dream of running blades?” Ridleyscott changed it based on some Rutgers Howie improv.

    • hopesdead@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      THAT’S NOT THE CHARACTER’S NAME YOU WEIRDO TECH BRO!

      Yes I am mad at Elon. Blade Runner: The Final Cut is my favorite movie.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m ok not having the bubble boat car. Of course, having better, more affordable EV options here in the US would be nice. But a lot of people don’t like EVs. Not sure why, but if you just gotta have your ICE vehicle, run it on biofuels that are at least renewable. Some of y’all are ridiculous: “Electric car? Biofuels? No, I HAVE to have an internal combustion engine, and it HAS to run on FOSSIL FUELS only!” Why?

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Big problem with biofuels currently is production. We haven’t figured out how to grow enough food AND biomass for fuel.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        And a bunch of the food is more or less fossil fuels turned into corn. Solar+wind+battery with some nuclear power mixed in is probably the way, but long haul transport might be able to work on bio if we could get out of the growth only economy of late stage of capitalism.

        I sometimes imagine a world where we make things that last, or can be repaired and our population has leveled off so that we can stop making the line go up and just keep it at some sustainable level. A lot of thing could change and keep us all happy.

        Maybe my kid’s grandkids will see it.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Then get an EV. Or drive less, or just pay the premium for biofuels, if you absolutely MUST have an internal combustion engine.

        We have to stop using fossil fuels. We just have to. And it’s not just about the climate, although that should be reason enough. Fossil fuels are non-renewable. Once fossil fuel reserves are depleted, they cannot be replenished on human timescales. And I know, I know, people will swear up and down that we’re not in danger of fossil fuel reserves becoming depleted anytime soon, but it’s inevitable, even if it isn’t imminent.

        Plus, we’ve already depleted most of the reserves that were relatively cheap and easy to extract, so what’s left is only going to get more difficult and more expensive to get out of the ground. Oil extraction would have peaked a long time ago if we didn’t start using more expensive extraction methods like hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which comes with its own ecological issues.

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I understand, and it’s wonderful you don’t care whether anyone questions your sexual orientation

      I care! I care plenty! I just don’t know how to make them stop!

      I know it’s a different show, but… I dunno. Suck a butt or something. At least it’s the same car

  • toothpaste_sandwich@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean, they both look like they would obliterate any unfortunate pedestrian they’d come in contact with… But the top one moreso. It’d cut them in half.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    This just shows that personal automobiles are bullshit. A bicycle has not changed fundamentally in over 100 years, meanwhile cars are constantly changing for no discernable reason.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The bicycle has changed quite a bit in the last hundred years. The modern derailleur was introduced in the 1930s. Moving the shifters to the handles was more recent. Clipless pedals and disc brakes were both introduced in the 70s. Carbon fiber frames reduced their weight substantially.

      Their basic shape hasn’t changed much, but everything else has.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The internal combustion engine is fundamentally unchanged since invention, so is the electric motor, both well over 100 years old too.

      And personal automobiles are still fundamentally the same as a horse driven carriage: four wheels with a box on top for seating and sheltering from weather, and a driver in front for steering. The first mechanically driven carriage even predates the bike by more than 200 years.