brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.comexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1532arrow-down113cross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1519arrow-down1external-linkNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.combrianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square82fedilinkcross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down5·edit-23 months ago?? You’re specifically making claims about me in your comment. “Source?” for those claims. Maybe you’ve become so reliant on AI you cant read and understand comments anymore? Put this exchange into ChatGPT and have it explain for you.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iocakelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·3 months agoOkay, so how do you go about the process of fact checking every news article you read?
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-23 months agoYou’re never going to believe this: i can take an article at face value because it’s not being routed through a slop generator when i read it. Whether or not a source can be believed to be true is not within the scope of this thread.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iocakelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·3 months agoRight, you take the article at face value. So exactly as I originally said: you sure are relying on just believing whatever you read without any checking whatsoever.
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoThat’s the opposite of what I said. I’m afraid you’ve given your ability to infer language to AI and therefore there is nothing more to say here. Have a nice day.
??
You’re specifically making claims about me in your comment. “Source?” for those claims.
Maybe you’ve become so reliant on AI you cant read and understand comments anymore? Put this exchange into ChatGPT and have it explain for you.
Okay, so how do you go about the process of fact checking every news article you read?
You’re never going to believe this: i can take an article at face value because it’s not being routed through a slop generator when i read it.
Whether or not a source can be believed to be true is not within the scope of this thread.
Right, you take the article at face value. So exactly as I originally said:
That’s the opposite of what I said.
I’m afraid you’ve given your ability to infer language to AI and therefore there is nothing more to say here. Have a nice day.