• ballgoat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Who cares if it’s a soft fork as long as it’s open source? The point is to keep the fork clean and if Mozilla fails, the community can just take it over.

    • picnic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Dunno how pale moon is doing nowadays, but forks either follow the bigger principles of the base project or wither into obscureness if the base project changes underlying technologies.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not really.

      Mozilla spends many millions a year on devs for their browser.

      If they stop doing that, LibreWolf won’t have any patches or updates.

      The community is t going to take over from mozilla.

      • ballgoat@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’m not saying it would be easy, but that’s the whole point behind open source. We’d have to at least try.

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          “the community taking over” is not the whole point behind open source.

          There’s plenty of open source projects that need 100s of developers with niche credentials and experience to maintain.

          If mozilla dies, and that’s the current trajectory, then ladybug or similar will be our refuge.