WHAT WOULD DONALD Trump have to do for the U.S. media to frame what he is doing in Venezuela as an act of war?

This isn’t a rhetorical question. It’s an actual inquiry, the pursuit of which can reveal a lot about how U.S. media’s default posture is state subservience and stenography. In the past few months, President Trump has committed several clear acts of war against Venezuela, including: murdering — in cold blood — scores of its citizens, hijacking its ships, stealing its resources, issuing a naval blockade, and attacking its ports. Then in a stunning escalation on early Saturday morning, the administration invaded Venezuela’s sovereign territory, bombing several buildings, killing at least 40 more of its citizens, kidnapping Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife from their bed, and announcing they will, henceforth, “run” the country.

This episode seems to indicate that the president can do almost anything in the context of foreign policy, and the media will still overwhelmingly adopt language that is flattering and sanitizing to the administration when describing what has unfolded. This dynamic reached a new low Saturday morning, when the U.S. media rushed to frame the administration’s unprovoked attack as, at worst, a “ratcheted up” (CBS News) “pressure campaign” (Wall Street Journal) and, as was more often the case, some type of limited narcotics police “operation” (CNN).

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    6 days ago

    If China decided that trump had violated some domestic law of theirs, and sent their military into Florida, dragged him and his third wife out of their beds, flew them back to their territory, and put them in prison, would these assholes consider that an act of war?

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    It is an act of war, the “capture” of Maduro is a kidnapping, and the deaths of ~80 cuban and venezuelan security and civilians is murder.

    USA is a rogue state.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Seriously, the US isn’t going to be the only country looking to put their finger on the scale in Venezuela. Heck, there’s plenty who will do so just to further entangle the US.

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    5 days ago

    USA Nukes Poland

    “The president took another eyebrow-raising strategy today, let’s talk to a panel of assorted youtube streamers to analyze what he meant with this action…”

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      Friggin RIGHT?!?!?!

      The semantics at play indicate the media “watchdogs” have put their tails between their legs and pissed themselves.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        Media is just bought and controlled by the corporate donor class who have installed this administration to begin with. Every major outlet is compromised.

        Every time you see media making the administration angry or they have spats, it’s just performance. I think if everyone realized how much of what we are experiencing is kayfabe people would have a mental breakdown.

  • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    The US media is owned by the same oligarchs who benefit from his fascism. Why would they bite the hand that feeds?

  • Sarah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    6 days ago

    “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters,”

    Or the support of the press !

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Major news organisations in general are really scared when it comes to pointing out things which are extreme, because they believe describing those things as extreme will lead to accusations of sensationalism. The reason they think that is because sensationalist outlets are indeed more likely to describe everything as extreme and make unjustified comparisons to extremities, so major media outlets often think that to be “unbiased” is to refuse to acknowledge that an action is extreme.

      Vox described this as the “this is fine” bias.

      • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Major “news” organisations are owned by oligarchs who support Trump so they have abandoned any pretence of accountability

      • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        This is bullshit, though, legacy media have no problem using sensationalist headlines when it suits their ideology. Example from New York Crimes on Oct 7th:

        Death to America, death to “Israel”

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Once you have replaced the press leadership with lackeys then yes. They had a very very productive 2025 for doing things to eliminate resistance

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    The subscription billionaire media companies are all complicit, and have been for quite a while.

    • melfie@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      As written by General Buttler in 1935, War is a Racket. The billionaire cabal benefits from war immensely, and the media they own and control will always sing the praises of war.

    • Naevermix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Who actually believed that justification? Not even the MAGA crowd believe it, they just straight up say its about oil. Back in 2016 they called neocons “rhinos”, now MAGA is neocon, cheering for the very same things they previously hated Bush Jr. for.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      As IF he gets anything close to a fair trial. Everything about this kidnapping was illegal to begin with. All world leaders can now be kidnapped in their beds by US Special Forces. What happened to Noriega will happen to Maduro.

      Why haven’t they captured genocider Netanyahu?? Oh right…….

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        There’s a longstanding law which says a court can disregard how the defendant ended up in the courtroom, regardless of the legality of the means used to get them there.

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Dipshits are gonna be greedy, fuck it up and turn it in to an another Afganistan. This time really close to home.

      Nobody likes Maduro. They should play with that, take their successful 30min and exit.

      • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        If nobody likes Maduro, why is the USA placing Venezuela under extreme economic sanctioning?

        Maduro is not an illegitimate or unpopular leader. The Bolivarian revolution was widely supported among the people of Venezuela and freed millions from poverty, until USA sanctions demolished their economy. The express purpose of USA sanctioning, according to the US government is to, and I quote, “bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government”. USA+EU sanctions additionally murder half a million innocents per year according to recent serious sociologic and medical studies.

        By defending regime change under extreme economic sanctioning, you’re approving the murders of 38 million people over the past 50 years of economic sanctions, and directly supporting the CIA strategy of “impoverish them until they change their minds”.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Maduro has been declared illegitimate by nearly every other nation, and the UN and EU. The election was a farce.

  • J92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Christ, I hope my country is putting some serious effort into jailbreaking their F-35s.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      So long as you’re fine with whatever consequences the US is willing to impose on you for doing so, this can’t seriously be that hard—right? IIRC, the US just controls the server that signs flight plans? So… worst case scenario, that’s managed by a chip without any write access? Reverse engineer the little chip to ask your own server for permission, no?

      Given we’re talking about state-sponsored capabilities here, am I oversimplifying things? I don’t feel like I am.