Grok, the AI chatbot launched by Elon Musk after his takeover of X, unhesitatingly fulfilled a user’s request on Wednesday to generate an image of Renee Nicole Good in a bikini—the woman who was shot and killed by an ICE agent that morning in Minneapolis, as noted by CNN correspondent Hadas Gold and confirmed by the chatbot itself.

“I just saw someone request Grok on X put the image of the woman shot by ICE in MN, slumped over in her car, in a bikini. It complied,” Gold wrote on the social media platform on Thursday. “This is where we’re at.”

Grok created the images after an account made the request in response to a photo of Good, who was shot multiple times by federal immigration officer Jonathan Ross—identified by the Minnesota Star Tribune—while in her car, unmoving in the driver’s seat and apparently covered in her own blood.

After Grok complied, the account replied, “Never. Deleting. This. App.”

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you went to a human illustrator and asked for that, you would (hopefully) get run out of the room or hung up on, because there’s a built in filter for ‘is this gross / will it harm my reputation to publish,’

    If there was no filter for the guy that requested the bot create this, what makes you think illustrators will have such a filter? How do you know it’s not an illustrator that would make such a thing?

    The problem here is human behavior. Not the machine’s ability to make such things.

    AI is just the latest way to give instructions to a computer. That used to be a difficult problem and required expertise. Now we’ve given that power to immoral imbeciles. Rather than take the technology away entirely (which is really the only solution since LLMs are so easy to trick; even with a ton of anti-abuse stuff in system prompts), perhaps we should work on taking the ability of immoral imbeciles to use them away instead.

    Do I know how to do that without screwing over everyone’s right to privacy? No. That too, may not be possible.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But that’s the point: if an illustrator made that image, we’d blame the person commissioning them and the illustrator. We’d blame the humans. Just like we’re blaming the human who thought it would be a good idea to generate this image.

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        So we’re not blaming Grok/Xitter, then?

        The article implied that the whole thing is because of Xitter’s AI. Not because there’s bad people that will use it.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Is both okay? As I said, the person generating the thing is just a lot more interesting right now, imo, because “Grok makes horrible thing what else is new”.