• hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    My spouse yelled at me after she showed me too many AI videos, and I would watch it and 1) if it’s under 15 seconds, 2) too good to be true, 3) has unrealistic physics, and/or 4) has AI artifacts, I wouldn’t enjoy the video, and just say “yeah, that’s AI.”

    She just wants to enjoy the videos, and didn’t care if staged or AI or what. She likes the concept of what’s on the video. AI takes that away from me, and not her, apparently.

    • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      If the video is obvious a fake and overexaggerated, I dont mind AI videos. Its no different than the shitposts people made before. But its the click farming shit that really irks me.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        One of the things that makes a staged video less troubling is that the staging itself always comes with tells. Camera angles, cuts, framing, and of course actual staging.

        AI videos can have that too, but they aren’t the inherent tells. AI tells are unnatural: bodies that shift in subtle ways, objects warped or merging outside the center of frame. It’s not stuff that you look for because it’s not stuff that actually happens in nature, or even in human constructed CGI all that often. But it does add up to a sense of uncanny valley.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        “I’ll take people shitting into my mouth over dogs. At least it’s real humans doing it.”

    • Safeguard@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      But that’s the point for the AI owners. To get people to not care about the destruction of your brain, the world, our income, our art, etc.

      At that point, when we stop pushing back, AI slop peddlers have won.

    • bisby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      If someone were to say to you “why did the chicken cross the road?” You wouldn’t demand that there is actually a chicken. You would accept it as a framework for a joke.

      The same holds true for staged videos or AI or anything. Is the framework important to the point? A video claiming people can fly and using AI as proof… That’s problematic. A staged bit where it would still be funny if it was just told verbally by a standup comedian? Who cares how real it is, the realness was never the point, the concept of the situation was.

      Almost all comedy movies are just long staged bits.

      And “how funny would this be if a standup comedian told this as a joke” vs “the context of this potentially actually happening is very important to the underlying humor of it” is a variable line for people. And that’s ok. Unless someone is in danger (don’t let someone jump off a cliff because ai said they can fly), other people’s lines don’t really affect you

      • hansolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s kind of a shame you’re getting down voted for this. It’s a perfectly reasonable perspective, and makes sense.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I feel like the photorealism is what makes it bad. When you notice it’s fake you feel lied to. If it’s a cartoon, or blatantly cartoonish, it doesn’t.

      • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        When you sit down to watch a movie, you know it isn’t real. When you watch media coverage of current events, you should not have to guess if it is or isn’t.

        • bisby@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I agree. But that’s wrong because lying about current events is wrong. This is what I meant about framework. AI is a tool in that regard and not the problem. There is plenty of “real” journalism out there spreading lies too that I have problems with.

          I’m fortunate I guess that most of the AI slop I dismiss is things more akin to baby panda sneezing scares mom panda. Where it doesn’t REALLY matter if it’s real because there are no consequences. It’s either funny or it’s not.