Things have gotten better and progress has been made from times past, it just seems worse now because we have more access to information. We’ve come far, and have further to go!

  • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    the last two are easily debunked. I hate shit like this because it reinforces an idea that time = progress. There are influential and powerful people alive today who would reverse any of these trends if it meant money in their pocket.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t get why they are comparing things to the depression rather than after ww2. 50 years would be a better measure. Also retirement wise people can’t always choose to so income and home ownership in retirment would be more practical.

        • Perfide@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well that’s easy, because the statistics wouldn’t paint the view they’re trying to convey. Saying things are better now than they were 100 years ago is as useful as saying things are better than they were 3000 years ago, aka completely useless to say since when you compare to more recent times like 40 years ago you can point to how many things have gotten objectively worse.

          We’ve made a lot of strides on social issues, but everything else? Lmao.