• burble@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This paragraph pretty much sums up where I’m at:

    Musk’s plan for the merged companies is predicated on several assumptions, including that AI is not a bubble, but rather a technology that will be fully embraced in the future; that orbital data centers are cost-competitive compared to ground-based data centers; and that compute is the essential roadblock that must be solved for widespread adoption of AI by society.

    I guess I just disagree with the CEO on all of those.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      that orbital data centers are cost-competitive compared to ground-based data centers

      Might as well work off of the assumptions that magical math-faeries will do all the computing in orbit, in exchange for candy canes. It’s about as realistic.

      Solar irradiance is only about 25-30% more efficient in orbit, so with 40% efficiency (VERY optimistic, ISS does about 14%) a 1GW orbital datacenter would require a mere 0.4 x 10^8 / 1300 m2 worth of solar panels, or a square 550m to a side.

      If we use ISS-style solar arrays, which generate ~7.5w/kg, and double the efficiency, it would weigh 66000 tons, which translates to 3800 Falcon 9 launches. Just to power it. That includes zero frames, zero GPU’s, and most importantly, zero cooling.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      AI is not a bubble

      orbital data centers are cost-competitive compared to ground-based data

      Press 𝕏 to doubt. Or maybe stay off of 𝕏 entirely :)