• Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    As long as that last paragraph is true, I could support this. There has to be enough motivation for them to get rid of bad cops before they become a problem, not after.

    Edit; But I also imagine that the insurance companies themselves would be pretty focused on making sure each cop was attending good training on how to be effective instead of what they’re currently getting which seems to be, “Everyone wants to kill you! Kill them first!”

    So, yeah, this could work.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There has to be enough motivation for them to get rid of bad cops before they become a problem, not after.

      I’m understand where you’re going with this statement in spirit, but not in execution. An officer is only a problem after they have done harm to the public for which they serve. How then could a department get rid of a bad officer before this bad behavior presents itself?