“There was no integrity in that room today, it seems like, when it came to Epstein and Maxwell,” Teresa Helm said after Wednesday’s House Judiciary Committee hearing.
Six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse and two members of another accuser’s family said they felt “degraded” during Wednesday’s contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing, at which Attorney General Pam Bondi refused to face them and apologize.
Several Epstein survivors and relatives were on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers grilled Bondi for over five hours about several matters, including the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein case. She was specifically questioned about why released files were heavily redacted and why several survivors’ names were not.
“There was such a lack of empathy today. There was such a lack of, honestly, humanity today,” Dani Bensky said on NBC’s “Hallie Jackson NOW.”
The only place to get an accurate number on this thing you should totally believe about everyone you meet is a test that the military definitely doesn’t give to everyone but can maybe be sourced probably.
Nope. The only place to get any idea about a true number is the military. Anyone who needs a security clearance gets tested. Which is more and more everyday. Anyone who fucks up gets tested. Which is most of them. There is no other place that can give you a accurate number due to the nature of people with no empathy. Instead of arguing with me go look for numbers on Cluster B disorders Particularly NPD. Anyone who lacks empathy exhibits it in some form. What you will find is a very low number of these people seek out help. Most of the testing done in the civilian world is court ordered. They will never seek out help for something they see as a superpower. What possible problem could there be for not giving a shit about others?
There is no other source with as large of a sampling of US citizens. I really wish I had time to find that site with all the information about it. It had a huge number of nested pages outlining the psychology of these assholes.
The only other place where testing is common is among people who are in a psychology field, either as a student or a practicing professional.
The number is 1 in 5 and its probably higher than that. I don’t care what you believe I know I’ve developed a really good skill at spotting them. Plenty of tells with their sort.
Why would the military be a representative sample? Maybe when we had the draft, sure. But even then their were conscientious objectors, and of course women weren’t drafted. And plenty of people voluntarily enlisted even in the Vietnam era.
Is it not reasonable to expect that those with high empathy levels would be less likely to voluntarily enlist? Knowing nothing else, I would expect the military to select for those with low empathy levels. It’s an obviously useful ability if your job is to kill other human beings. And you’re supposed to carry out orders without any consideration for the consequences of those orders or who they hurt. That sounds like an extremely low-empathy environment.
Anther pointless argument that ignores what I’ve said to try to tell me the military is a poor place to get that information. Totally ignoring its the only place it exists. Also another useless pointless argument to try to convince me that all the people that join the army are killers. They are not natural killers and if you actually knew any or any vets you would know that.
I suspect at this point I’m talking to the same people who just switch accounts to try to gaslight me. There is data from other sources but the military is the largest sample. The next being medical students. I think people from the psychology field are next and I haven’t bothered to look again (why would I?) to see their exact percentage but I recall its around 14 percent. The number that is reported by trained professionals is absurdly low because people without empathy are terrified of and hate therapy.
I’m secure in my knowledge. My therapist and my psychiatrist have looked at the same information I do. Real people with real degree’s agree with me and nothing some random person on the internet says to try to argue against it will change my mind.
Its amazing how many are jumping in here to argue against it. Its not the first time but the baseless incorrect assumptions are always the same.
That’s a really weird thing to say because you posted a source that provided statistics beyond the military survey, which pointedly proved that statement false.
Then you denied saying that the military was the only source when that fact was pointed out.
But you are now trippling down on that false claim.
It seems like you might have the inability to admit fault and truly apologize. Which is also what you accused others of.
Might be time to take a break and question some preconceived notions. Like, no hate. You are on one right now. 20 percent of people are not who you think they are. It’s probably healthy to realize that.
Cool cool. And how does this source you wish you could find about a biased sample of the public, the only one possible of course, quantify “lacks empathy”.
Go away. when I have time and at home I will find it and post it but I’m sure you will find fault with it as well.
Until then I will remained convinced that 20 percent of the entire human population is some quantified amount of psychopathic.
links in my original post. I drew three people or three accounts arguing against it this time. Not one in five but consider the subject and the subjects of the subject.
First source says .5 percent of the population and 20 percent of the military. Which is exactly what you were questioned about.
1. The military is a biased sample.
2. The military is not the only source of statistics.
Also, kind of a shit source that doesn’t appear to reference anything, to be fair.
I never said it was. I said its the largest. Your bias and probably your condition will always prevent you from considering it. Goodbye. Go away. Go feel right about everything somewhere else.
Yes you did, it was like a big point you made and doubled down on. But ok.
That source didn’t verify that claim, either. And the other source doesn’t mention statistics at all.
Nevertheless, you are right that goodbyes are in order.