Civilloquy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days ago

Ring calls off partnership with police surveillance provider Flock Safety

www.engadget.com

external-link
message-square
24
fedilink
271
external-link

Ring calls off partnership with police surveillance provider Flock Safety

www.engadget.com

return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days ago
message-square
24
fedilink
Ring has canceled its partnership with Flock Safety, after receiving backlash for running a Super Bowl ad touting its Search Party feature.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • winni@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    10 days ago

    now they do it in secret

  • Marleyinoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    10 days ago

    They’ll just do it under the table. Cancel your plans and get something you can record locally and stream yourself. Look into Amcrest with Hubitat or similar setup.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    10 days ago

    Wow they must have really taken a sales dive. Nice.

  • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ring tried to unshow their hand*

  • mikmorg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 days ago

    … You can’t unring that bell.

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      👏 slow clap

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 days ago

    Ring calls off public partnership with police surveillance provider Flock Safety

  • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Aside from direct vandalism or persuasion, is there something I can do to combat the Ring cameras on nearly every door in my neighborhood?

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I can’t think of anything, that’s kind of the options isn’t it? Buy your neighbors switchbots or reolink cameras as a gift? Them switching by choice is persuasion… forcing them to switch without giving them a choice is vandalism. I can’t fathom a 3rd category, unless you can like… sue the hell out of amazon and force a recall, but pretty sure the legal system doesn’t work that way.

    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      There’s clothing you can wear.

      https://urban-privacy.com/pages/anti-surveillance-clothing

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      A little drone with a laser?

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        What else could work, a smallish drone that lands/hovers near electronics, and kicks in an electromagnet to fry electronics. It could even have a probiscus like a mosquito to concentrate the magnetic force closer to the target.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Aside from asking nicely or doing it yourself, uhhh… do it with magic?

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Lasers can break a lot of cameras. Idk strength but even multiple laster pointers were enough to take out some cameras. More powerful ones you get into eye protection problems though. One refraction and you can get permanent damage and you need specialized protection for your eyes to be sure as it’s different wavelengths of light than welding type protection that is cheaper because it’s more mass produced.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 days ago

    For now.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 days ago

    Do we only care while they do it or can we manage to care that they would do it?

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 days ago

      They already have been doing it. This is just an upgrade to what they were already doing. Ring cameras were already being used by the police for years.

  • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    Incoming updated privacy statement

  • mrnobody@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’ve got most my neighbors to replace expensive doorbells with cheap ones with sd cards and better imaging. They’re happy to have spent $50-100 where it pays for itself in a year vs this shit.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Also why my home gym beats my old gym membership. Higher investment up front, better returns. Well done.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Any specific recommendations?

      • mrnobody@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Not really. I bought a Fiet Electric one from Menards (like Home Depot). All my smart devices are on their own VLAN on my home net. Yes it’s still online connected for remote viewing, but gives me a little separation and immediate storage/historical access.

        I think this is it. I cantt remember, I don’t use the doorbell

        https://www.feit.com/products/doorbell-smart-wi-fi-camera-with-sd-card-cam-door-wifi-sd

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Riiiiight 😉😉

  • TwinTitans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Security cameras connected to the Internet are just…a terrible idea.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.55K users / day
  • 7.82K users / week
  • 12.8K users / month
  • 23.9K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 81.7K subscribers
  • 16.4K Posts
  • 520K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org