A lot going on here.

• Online sources was r/epstein and the og post was removed
• Reports also indicate that Kirk’s parents had occupations that placed her in environments tied to data collection and surveillance, which some whistleblowers argue could have been leveraged to facilitate recruitment or manipulation of victims. While Kirk has denied several of these claims, inconsistencies in her past interviews have led to increased scrutiny over her activities.
• Online discussions suggest that Kirk’s association with the pastor is troubling, particularly given her past claims of working with trafficking victims in China. While Kirk previously stated on podcasts that she lived in Chongqing to assist child victims, she now denies ever living in China, raising questions about her credibility. *Observers note that Kirk’s proximity to these organisations, combined with her history of public advocacy, creates a concerning pattern. Whistleblowers point to her repeated presence near alleged trafficking operations, suggesting she may have been a facilitator or participant in activities that remain under investigation.

We all know that she’s probably guilty, but they’re listing reddit as a source. OTOH, it sounds like the claims can be verified (or not). 🤷