• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m using Rocknix on an android handheld and it feels so powerful to be running 6.18 mainline kernel with all the modern features I want despite having to build stuff from source since the package manager only has a small list of stuff mostly meant for networking (Entware).

    Even though its in beta for my device (AYn Thor), it works so well after only 4 months of development that I’m genuinely reaching the point of perma install and removing the stock Android install from the device.

    I would pay cold hard cash for an OEM to do the same with PostmarketOS. Throw in proper open source kernel modules and use Steam’s upcoming waydroid fork for Android compatibility, and then throw that sucker in the market and watch Google try to litigate it out of existence.

    • mal3oon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      I hardly think an OEM would do this, no incentives. It needs to be crowdfunded by us. It’s just China is the only manufacturing hub, and we all know, china is not too keen on freedom, and letting go of control. One can hope.

  • hellomoto@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    We need alternatives to big tech. They’re reigning in and locking everything they can down, and the states are loving them for it as it solidifies their ability to control us.

    • danhab99@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They’re kind of already is. It’s the free and open source community.

      The problem is phones are actually incredibly impressive pieces of hardware and the fact that we can Mass produce them has diluted that opinion. I’m actually to look into building my own phone and I wanted to have at least some near-flagship specs. I know how to design my own circuit boards and get someone to print them. But acquiring CPUs that perform at least 1/4 as well as Pixels or iPhones is objectively not possible, these companies have deals with manufacturers for exclusive products. And even if you could these chips are so precise you will never be able to figure out the signaling yourself.

      Maybe things have gotten better now that we have ai and you don’t need to be any sort of expert in anything you just need to be good enough at decision making problem solving and communicating to acquire the skills and knowledge to work on these chips. And by the time you’ve done all the work and acquired all the hardware you might have spent close to 3 to 5K on a device you could have just bought for $800. All for what, to circumvent privacy breaches that should be illegal in the first place?

      And that’s the root problem we’re trying to solve. Another symptom of these companies being able to engage in the bad behavior that they do is that they gain the ability to overvalue themselves. There should be no safety or privacy concern when engaging in the purchase of any device for the same reason that people should not fear food poisoning every time they go to the grocery store.

      That’s what the regulators are for. This is a legal issue not a technical one.

      But the only underlying cause for why we’re not regulating tech companies is because fear of privacy violations is not reducing market activity. Apparently people are still going to use their phones even if their phones are listening to them having private conversations. Apparently people will still buy shit off of their phones even if their phones are going to use that data to show them ads.

      Apparently the harm of your privacy being breached does not hurt enough to prevent you from doing good things.

      Now if Android takes away my F-Droid, Tasker and Termux I’m gonna throw a fit. That’s not privacy that’s self-determination, I bought an Android because I can customize it to be as low friction for me as I need, if my phone starts giving me friction then we’re going to have problems.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      What we need is a good linux phone that is affordable, has hardware that isn’t slow, and isn’t over sold to an annual pre-order.

      Sadly, if the first two are true, the third one becomes an issue.

      What we need is a large company to see that is a sign of huge pent-up demand. Apparently, HP and Dell are both talking about switching to Linux as their default OS for desktops. Once all the desktop manufacturers find themselves in the business of selling hardware with Linux on it, either mobile manufacturers will copy, like Samsung, or the desktop folks decide to make their product smaller.

      What everyone has wanted from the beginning was a desktop in their pocket. The amount of time that no one has produced that despite major demand, and the amount of development that has gone into building any other stack, just feels like willful suppression at this point.

      Is there some government somewhere telling large-scale manufacturers that they can’t build something as free and open as a desktop that isn’t at least the size of a laptop? Because it actually takes less technology to make something that’s open than something that is closed. And there is just as much appeal for the consumer to not restrict them.

    • dismay3915@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Those who have the expertise should start contributing and working more on Linux for mobile. Postmarket has made great progress it just needs more manpower

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    52 minutes ago

    It’s a shame webos got bought and turned into a tv os. It would shine on modern hardware and was ‘rooted’ out of the box.

  • eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Fuck you Google. I won’t do further updates on my Pixel and the moment I run into an issue I’ll move operating systems or phones if required. Half my apps don’t come from Google Play and I don’t want the developers to have to register with Google for anything.

  • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Starting in September 2026, Android will require all apps to be registered by verified developers in order to be installed on certified android devices.

    I wonder… I know that we used to mod our consoles due to the limits of ‘certified’ official software.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    On the one hand, google is obviously evil, and it’s intentions here are undoubtedly evil as well. On the other, I do think some kind of verification of developers should exist. Just not in google hands. But who. There really isn’t anyway to create an organization that could be trusted to do this. And of course, the user should be able to chose to install apps from an unverified developer.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s how it works on Windows already. You buy a cert from a third party vendor so your setup file can pass Windows security checks and doesn’t show a big warning to the user when they open the setup file.

    • Mohamad20ZX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Couldn’t agree more Especially when the Pine Phone Pro is improving every year since its has came out and with Posh shell and Waydroid nothing will stop Linux from succeeding in the modern era

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        As far as I know, it is still reliant on the whims of Google through shenanigans with AOSP, and of course having to use a Pixel.

        Linux offers a more solid and independent foundation, and while it is less polished yet, to me it’s the only real way out in the long run.

        Still, GrapheneOS is a big step in the right direction - hope it wouldn’t come across as me being against the project.

        • nile_istic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They’ve signed with an OEM (still secret atm, but the best guess seems to be Motorola?) who will produce the first flagship GrapheneOS device sometime this or next year iirc. Supposed to be revealing the manufacturer next month. That’ll at least take some of the Google dependency by having to use Pixels.

        • fishy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yup, if enough people switch to graphene big G will fuck them over. Exiting entirely is the only long term solution.

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Fuck, I don’t have the money to replace my phone. I probably wont by September either. Too many expenses.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Feels a lot more interesting to just pick up a feature phone, and use it as a hotspot modem for a laptop.