I’m always surprised by how well Utah and Idaho do. Seems like life expectancy has more to do with geography than politics.
It’s the Mormonism.
bubbles are really not the right format for this data presentation. bar graph?
I don’t have proof but I guess the lower a population is the more value a single citizen is in the eyes of the government in turn much higher life expectancy.
For every state that is below Alaska…
Have you seen Alaska? Have you spent time there? Alaska is crazy dangerous! How bad must your healthcare be that the constant threat of the entire environment being against you doesn’t win out for short life expectancy?!
And Mississippi, just… be better.
Id like to think its because people live healthier lifestyles in Alaska but I know better.
So much meth.
People from Mississippi after seeing the graphic: “Great! I fucking hate it here!”
Nobody wants this.
Gestures broadly at soybeans and poverty.
Interesting graph. One thing I noticed that might make the graph easier to read: there are official post office abbreviations for states. OK for Oklahoma, AK for Alaska, ME for Maine, etc. Most people looking for their state will recognize the two-letter abbreviations easier.
This American obsession with those awful abbreviations is exhausting. Foreigners should not have to remember if AL is Alabama or Alaska or MI is Mississippi or Michigan, especially when lacking any context clue as to which one it is. “ME” for Maine is straight up evil. Can you name the TLD of Peru of the top of your head?
There are places where abbreviations make sense: where there will be extreme repetition (TLDs, letters) or where space and readability are under tight constraint (license plates, next to the points counter on a football broadcast). An already extremely sparse infographic with no hard layout restriction is decidedly not either of those things and should therefore just use the full goddamn name instead of trying to signal “hey look this is made by an American for an American, fuck everyone else”.
People not from the US will prefer names, not some (for most of the world) meaningless abbreviations.
In my experience, many people outside of the states can only really name a few specific states. Often it’s New York, California, Hawaii, Texas, Florida, and/or Alaska.
I’d wager quite a bit of money that less than 50% of people outside of the US would be able to identify which name in the following list is not one of the 50 states: Navajo, Idaho, Utah, and Montana.
As American politics and decisions have a big influence on what is happening in the world, the chance that someone from outside the US knows something about the US are bigger, way bigger than the other way round. We speak your mother tongue, but you probably don’t speak any of ours…
That said, it would be rather interesting to see Navajo as a state. It would probably located in the Utah/Arizona/New Mexico area. If it existed.
Or just use full names.
if the text was going to require zooming anyway it may as well have used the actual name instead of the weird shorthand that only people from the states know
Not necessarily a reflection of happiness or quality of life (and health). Interesting nonetheless. I’m curious if there’s correlation between general population wealth, warm weather, regional diets, potential for outdoor activities (hence warm weather, but also being coastal), and of course genetics.
I’m asking for too much, studies are long and complicated. Just want to outlive my kids here.
Well, Spain has a very good universal health care system, which by the way places an emphasis on prevention, and is universally liked for the quality of life (work to live, not live to work), people are super social, weather is generally very good, good food is a religion, people walk, etc… so we could infer some things from this.
Hawaii, from what I remember (two decades ago) had a bit of that vibe. A lot of obesity, though.In broad strokes, the three biggest drivers for life expectancy are education, health care, and social safety nets (i.e. unemployment insurance, subsidized/free child care, housing support, UBI, etc). Of those, I think education is the most important because that will drive the rest to improve as well.
There is a strong correlation between shitty health care and low life expectancy.
Well most are less overweight, but Australia being up there throws that off I think they are overweight as all the commonwealth countries generally are?
Public health. It’s fuckin great, mate.
The proof is in the pudding
Japan, Australia, Korea, all have more homogenous societies, so their malign actors have less success turning citizens against each other to benefit themselves in doing things like cheating them on healthcare.
In the US, and other large countries generally, the disparate groups are played off of each other, and otherized, and they will get a large share of the population to support hurting, cheating, those others.
Actually, not especially homogeneous. Australia is fantastically multicultural with an indigenous population who have dramatically lower life expectancies, for complex reasons. But we have universal healthcare and governments that care, which makes a huge difference.
What’s really interesting is Japan. Private health but high quality and reasonably affordable. I reckon their figures are also propped up by generational longevity which will diminish as the elderly die off and shitty western lifestyles creep in with the youth.
I didn’t know Japan had private health, does that mean they have uninsured? What percent are the minorities in Australia though? I just looked it up it’s similar to the US. But its a smaller country, which makes it more difficult to play groups off of each other. My point is still correct, larger, more diverse countries allow malign forces to turn the population against each other more, which in the case of the US has led the population to support allowing others to die of preventable illness.
