“It’s really, really scary. We are going to be living on the brink,” one borrower said.

Tens of millions of Americans with federal student loan debt have had a financial reprieve for more than three years as a pandemic-era repayment pause was extended multiple times since March 2020.

Now many face a new reality on Sunday, Oct. 1, when they are due to resume making payments, all while struggling with nagging inflation and rising interest rates.

More than 45 million borrowers together owe approximately $1.6 trillion, according to President Joe Biden’s administration, which tried to cancel up to $20,000 in student debt for tens of millions of eligible borrowers, only to have the Supreme Court kill the program in June.

  • Tygr@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1992·
    1 year ago

    3 years to make principal-only payments to get ahead of a debt they agreed to repay.

    Instead, now their debt will grow faster than their mandatory minimum payments.

    Yes, my daughter and son did use the time to pay theirs off and in great careers.

    Personal responsibility? Commence the downvotes.

    • kaitco@lemmy.world
      38·
      1 year ago

      I mean…I still owe $8K and I spent the last three years paying directly to the principal as well. That said, I still hate this. Rather than being able to pay off in another year or so, it’s going to be closer to five years.

      There’s options available. Like, how about a “step up” rather than just reopening the floodgates? Turn on the repayments, but not the interest. How about keep the interest off the last $20K if you’re not in the rears? Allow people to get a chance to make progress on their debts, or at least give an incentive on keeping the payments current.

      A direct return to the status quo doesn’t get lenders their money in a time of rising rates, and it definitely doesn’t help those in debt nor the overall economy.

      • jasory@programming.dev
        27·
        1 year ago

        “Allow people to get a chance”

        They had 3 years… before that it was expected that they would make payments. Are you under the impression that everyone took out these loans thinking that they would never have to pay them back?

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          4·
          1 year ago

          So do you not understand who has the most trouble paying off this debt or what’s up?

          Most high-risk student loan debt is held by college dropouts. People who went to college, it wasn’t for them (or life intervened), and they had to leave college - with the debt and without the benefit.

          We as a society urge students to go to college because having a highly educated workforce is a good thing. This is an externality we created and it behooves us to resolve this externality socially.

          The question of “personal responsibility” is, as is so often the case, irrelevant when discussing governance. You don’t govern for the best case scenario, you govern to address externalities.

          • jasory@programming.dev
            24·
            1 year ago

            I like how you add information that I never critiqued. The point is that claiming that having 3 years of minimal payments is somehow not a reprieve from the previous circumstances, is utterly false.

            If you want to argue for free university, then fine do it. But do it from the very beginning, don’t tack it on to some vaguely related initial comment.

            “The question of personal responsibility is irrelevant in governance”

            I actually agree, it’s where I think conservatives fail. Where liberals fail is ascribing moral blame for personal decisions on others. When someone makes a conscious personal decision to take risk, you can’t just blame society for when they individually have an unsatisfactory outcome. (It’s the same shit we get when we ask how society failed all those poor mass shooters).

            Now of course this entire post was an individualistic claim, so maybe you can see why I didn’t start with a federal policy critique.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      402·
      1 year ago

      Personal responsibility gets all screwed up by math. I know school was a long time ago for you but you can use a calculator.

      I graduated over 20 years ago. I paid for it all by myself as I was on my own at 17. My schools annual tuition/fees books was around 3.5K. Lodging/utilities/etc cost me $5,000 (roommates and no car). So a total of around $8.5K/year. I worked 25hrs per week at $7.25/hr for a gross income of around $9,400. I ended up $3K in debt. It took me 5 years to pay it off after I graduated. I started out at $27K.

      My sons a sophomore this year at a the same school. Tuition is 9.7K lodging/utilities, etc around $14,000/year. So around $23.7K/year. Minimum wage in the state just went to $13.20. At 25hrs per week this is a gross income of $17K.

      So my son would end up $30k+ in debt doing the exact same thing I did.

      I start out my career making 27K with 3K in debt. Only 11% of my gross . Itwasn’t that hard to pay it off and was never a major concern.

      My son would start out making around 45k/year with more than 30K in debt. 66% of his gross income.

      • jasory@programming.dev
        111·
        1 year ago

        Nothing you said supported your thesis statement.

        Personal responsibility is choosing to take on debt and then paying it off. The money amounts are not relevant, especially not a difference as small as you presented. Even the fact of it being a college loan doesn’t matter, any sort of investment borrowing would apply.

      • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
        6·
        1 year ago

        They also got free money then sued here because they didn’t get any free money from the student loan forgiveness