James Talarico won the Democratic nomination for a US Senate seat in Texas on Tuesday, capping a remarkable rise from state lawmaker and seminary student to the party’s standard-bearer in one of the key races of the 2026 midterm cycle.

With his blend of faith-based populism, bipartisan appeal and generational energy, Talarico defeated Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, a firebrand beloved by the party’s base but who struggled to dispel concerns that she could defeat a Republican in a state that has not elected a Democrat statewide in more than 30 years.

A jubilant Talarico told supporters in Austin before the race was called: “We are not just trying to win an election. We are trying to fundamentally change our politics. And it’s working.”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s not about race…

    Talarico is more progressive and can convince people to agree with him.

    Crockett is more conservative and just yells at people, that’s why the NRSC manipulated her into running, why after that came out she refused to acknowledge it, and why she’s now claiming the reason she lost is racism and she’s suing.

    Even if we were skipping a general and either one was guaranteed to be a Texas Senator, Talarico.was the best choice.

    It wasn’t just “who’s most electable” and frankly it’s concerning that so many people didn’t look deeper than skin color but are so opinionated on this.

    You’re the reason the NRSC tried this manipulation, because it worked on you.

    We can’t afford for it to happen again, look into candidates and what they actually have as a platform. Not just who’s the most outrageous on social media.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ah, but you’re forgetting that this is america where if a white man wins any competition against a black woman, the only conceivable reason has to be racism.

      If people vote based on the merits of the individuals’ policy platforms or who they receive their funding from, then it’s racism plain and simple. Only the people whose voting choices are entirely based on skin color aren’t racist. Anything else is colorblind racism.

      In case it isn't clear:

      /s, but some people do insist on this unironically

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You’re literally falling for Republican propaganda…

        The National Republican Senatorial Committee put out a poll in July with Crockett’s name included, which showed her as the leading Democrat in a hypothetical matchup.

        “When we saw the results, we were like, ‘OK, we got to disseminate this far and wide,’” a source familiar with the process told NOTUS.

        The fact that Crockett was included in the poll was no accident.

        In June news broke that Texas Democrats Colin Allred, James Talarico, former Rep. Beto O’Rourke and Rep. Joaquin Castro met to discuss the 2026 election. Operatives at the NRSC realized that Crockett — whose political stock had been rising — wasn’t included in that meeting and also hadn’t been included in any credible poll. So they decided to change that.

        https://www.notus.org/senate/jasmine-crockett-nrsc-texas-senate

        That propaganda is literally the only reason she ran:

        Crockett herself even admitted she was encouraged to jump into the race by all the positive polling she was seeing ahead of her announcement.

        "The more I saw the poll results, I couldn’t ignore the trends that were clear,” Crockett said during her announcement speech.

        Crockett did not return a request for comment.

        We can’t afford to just ignore that people are being manipulated…

      • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s part of it, of course. He’s more “electable” (cough hhhwhite).

        But there’s a lot to dislike about Jasmine Crockett for this particular race without even getting into policy - just campaign strategy.

        Her strategy is to energize dem voters in Texas at the expense of angering conservatives and “moderates”. She’s good at that, and has been vocally slapping down Republican politicians on the hill for a while now. That will all be used against her by the Republican opposition in this race. They will use her viral clips in smear campaigns to energize Republican voters to save their state from the woke angry black lady - that is a message that will land great with their base and even with many “moderates/undecideds”. There’s a reason the republican party has backed her campaign, and it isn’t because they think she can win. It’s about race and gender, but also messaging.

        Talarico is much more mild mannered and has a strategy of winning over Republican voters. That is not usually a winning strategy. But in Texas when many people want an alternative to Trump & cronies that shares their christian values? It’s got a real shot. People are fucking stupid and care more about messaging than actual politics. He’s got the messaging that will appeal to them. He’s a seminarian. He looks like a choir boy. He is fucking great at rhetoric. He is electable for more reasons than just race.

        • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          The worst part of this, is that you and other people do see it that way.

          The thing that really bothers me is that Republicans vote against their interests, “leftists” vote on what they think someone’s interests are, and the majority just wants to fucking live. And we get outvoted on hate or speculation every single time.

          And when I say we, I mean us.

          • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Again, I was ignoring policy in that comment.

            I believe Talarico’s policies/positions and alignments (especially regarding Israel as Crockett is AIPAC funded & trans rights) are better.

            • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              That is policy. I’m not here to say you’re wrong. I’m honestly just a bit shell shocked at what I was doing. I tend to agree with most on here, but I got taken by surprise with this candidate specifically.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They also had the earned media from the Trump/ Colbert thing.

          I genuinely think Crockett wins without that. That was hundreds of millions in earned media, and just an unforced error on the part of Trump.

          If Trump had just “done nothing”, that Talarico interview maybe gets 80k views coming from people who just “Like Colbert”. Instead it got millions of views because it was the thing everyone was interested in for 48 hours. And it got a lot of people who would have not known who Talarico was to learn the name.