• CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know nothing about mobile OS development. How realistic is it at this point for someone to fork Android?

    I know that software like Edge and Iron Fox can be forked and worked on by independent people. But Android is developed to integrate tightly with proprietary hardware.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Forking the OS isn’t a big issue. The big issue is people installing the fork.

      To install custom rooms you have to unlock the bootloader. Which can be easy, to impossible, depending on the phone.

      But unlocking the bootloader breaks many of the security features. Stuff like NFC payments no longer work. So basically the phone is crippled.

      • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Finding a custom ROM for your particular device is also a pain. So you can get a cheap phone, a recent one, or one with custom ROMs available.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        adding to this, android itself as compiled from available sources is actually pretty good and is by itself already unaffected by this change.

        play services is basically how they managed to close android in the first place while still making it look open.

    • mesa@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      People have done it. The problem is the huge binary blobs for hardware. Its difficult without the hardware company themselves giving you the specs to make your own.

      One of the reasons fairphone is supported on many alternate platforms.