• fierysparrow89@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As with everything crypto this was a huge scam. Besides the obvious profiting from gullable idiots, the other use case is to illegally funnel money.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This was never anything aside from a scam designed to separate the tech illiterate from their money.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I remember playing with Stable Diffusion in 2022, and thinking “Oh. That’s the end of NFTs.”

    NFT art was stupid to begin with, of course, but SD was such a blatent, extreme inverse of the “artifical digital scarcity” angle. If I wanted a shitty, albeit “unique” and deterministically reproducible digital image, I could just make it in 30 seconds on a desktop. If I wanted a certain look, I could use img2img or eventually controlnet and all sorts of augmentations.

    Yes, junky AI was junky AI, but ironically it was the antithesis of everything NFTs stood for. Instead of “digital information is worth commodifying at great expense,” it was “digital information is basically free.” And I still find it amusing that Tech Bros and con artists jumped from one ship to the other so quickly, or somehow have feet in both.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      AI wasn’t the NFT killer, right click > saveas killed it at the very moment of conception.

      Digital scarcity is a complete joke.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Sure you can copy the image, but you can’t have the same machine-readable hash indicating ownership in my private system!

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The way money-laundering works, you take ill-begotten funds and somehow churn it into legal tender in ways that can’t be traced back to the source. Another angle is to create corporate entities that show loss against gains, so you can deduct and don’t have to pay taxes on your windfall profits.

    In the olden days, these were physical, degrading assets. Like strip malls, real-eestate, and dodgy, money-losing businesses that somehow stuck around forever. At the end, you were stuck with physical entities you couldn’t unload.

    Crypto and NFT were just digital variations of the same financial model, minus the hassle of having to manage the property.

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What? You mean digital art that infinitely reproducible, can’t actually be owned, WASN’T the next big thing? Oh jeez. I hope the metaverse succeeds and if not then AI surely will RIGHT?!?!

  • linule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    These ape NFTs are also the ugliest and dumbest thing ever. Their faces look like hairy testicles. Whoever spent more than like $0.5 for this, fully deserves the outcome.

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    but for a brief period of time, some people made some money, while most participants lost

    edit: do AI next