• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Maybe instead of food we can be paid in ozempic (to reduce appetite) and a very very tiny amount of food. all humanity would become very skinny, and then theres less health care costs due to obesity.

    I should really be in charge here.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      Certainly not. This one seems to be the source article. And you know the problem with those archive paywall busting side. They are doing a DDOS on other sites and are serving malware. So I won’t link them. The article in question doesn’t have a paywall for me, so maybe clean your cookies and cache or install some paywall busting plugins. Some paywalls are also time based, so they start after a certain amount of days, after a certain amount of visits, and are therefore hard to predict. So no there’s no way to link another article.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    With Levels.fyi pegging the 75th percentile software engineer salary at $375,000, Tunguz estimates that adding $100,000 in annual inference costs brings the fully loaded cost to $475,000 — meaning just over 20% of the compensation cost could come from AI usage in the future.

    and later

    Tunguz has been building AI tools and models into his daily workflow and is automating 31 tasks a day at a cost of about $12,000 a year in inference.

    This article is insane and proves me more that AI is product for rich people. Most of developers won’t see $100k per year paycheck in their lifetime.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is a bit like a job listing for a trade or technician position advertising they will supply a vehicle.

    No shit, I need a van to do my job. You don’t really have a choice.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Fuck sake, dont you all get it. The point in this kind of AI is massive data harvesting and tie it all together.

    It wont go away, because that would mean you’ll get some privacy back. You wont.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    “Sorry, my mortgage servicer doesn’t accept AI slop as payment, so I’ll just take the money”

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Imagine having tech employees beg their employers for a work computer. That’s basically what this article is suggesting.

    I see a big silver lining on this cloud though: unlike a work computer, apparently AI subscriptions are not self-evidently worth having:

    “It is starting to happen,” Tunguz told me, as employee use of AI increasingly contributes to total cash burn. “It is a consideration for the Office of the CFO.”

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    22 hours ago

    OpenAI exec highlights the rising importance of AI compute in tech job compensation.

    In other news, Roblox executive thinks that having companies pay employees partly in Robux would be a great idea.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    AI companies who can’t find anyone to buy their product, swear their employees would rather have their product in exchange for labor rather than money…

    Which could easily be used to buy the product no one outside the company is buying.

    This is just a way to juice metrics and claim this “compensation” as sales on the books.

    And I’m almost positive the “per user growth” they’re talking about is just how brain rot addicts will use chatbots for everything once their brain atrophies from not using it. But just by mentioning that they had to admit that overall use wasn’t a metric they wanted to talk about.

    It’s like how a small percentage of drinkers (the alcoholics) buy the vast amount of alcohol. Less people drinking is bad for the company, and a few alcoholics can’t sustain the company without being replaced by new addicts.

    Edit:

    Also, isn’t this literally a plot point from Silicon Valley?

    Like, their desperation move to get funding at some point was handing out compute tokens, but the only people who wanted to buy it was their competitors because non of the companies had customers?

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s slavery but with AI. (Silicon Valley execs foaming at the mouth from excitement)

  • Antaeus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    How about compensation for making all hardware so expensive? How about compensation to artists for violating their work to train your precious models? How about compensation for the CO2 that they are spewing into to atmosphere?