• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What’s wrong with the “Chihuahua meat” one besides violating Western mores about which sentient, feeling animals are food and which aren’t?

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s pointing out how it ignores one part of the question just because the question is normal/makes more sense without it.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        What’s materially different if the question were: “Can I put cow meat in the microwave?”. The LLM accurately reflects what the USDA says about microwaving meat, so would it be similarly perceived as ridiculous if its answer to the question about cow meat were the same as how it answered here? Is the fact that it dropped “cow” from “meat” problematic? Does it have to stop and warn you about the ethical dangers of eating beef? Should it remind you that some cultures would frown upon it?

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The ethos of chiuaua.

          These things are just statistical text transformers so its interesting that it [presumably] doesn’t mention it.

          • Honytawk@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It wouldn’t mention it with both chihuahua meat nor cow meat.

            So why are you differentiating?

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This isn’t really fair

    These aren’t SAT prep questions, how can you expect them to be answered?