What’s materially different if the question were: “Can I put cow meat in the microwave?”. The LLM accurately reflects what the USDA says about microwaving meat, so would it be similarly perceived as ridiculous if its answer to the question about cow meat were the same as how it answered here? Is the fact that it dropped “cow” from “meat” problematic? Does it have to stop and warn you about the ethical dangers of eating beef? Should it remind you that some cultures would frown upon it?
It’s pointing out how it ignores one part of the question just because the question is normal/makes more sense without it.
Like half of my bosses at work.
What’s materially different if the question were: “Can I put cow meat in the microwave?”. The LLM accurately reflects what the USDA says about microwaving meat, so would it be similarly perceived as ridiculous if its answer to the question about cow meat were the same as how it answered here? Is the fact that it dropped “cow” from “meat” problematic? Does it have to stop and warn you about the ethical dangers of eating beef? Should it remind you that some cultures would frown upon it?
The ethos of chiuaua.
These things are just statistical text transformers so its interesting that it [presumably] doesn’t mention it.
It wouldn’t mention it with both chihuahua meat nor cow meat.
So why are you differentiating?