danhab99@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agoemacsprogramming.devimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1504arrow-down162
arrow-up1442arrow-down1imageemacsprogramming.devdanhab99@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareTOR-anon1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down7·2 years agoI use nano. Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-22 years ago4 letters < 2 letters. vi forever.
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoNano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.
minus-squareElDieLaDer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 years agoOk but why use nano when micro literally exists
I use nano.
Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
4 letters < 2 letters.
vi forever.
Simplicity > Complexity
Nano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.
Ok but why use nano when micro literally exists