danhab99@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoemacsprogramming.devimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1504arrow-down162
arrow-up1442arrow-down1imageemacsprogramming.devdanhab99@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareTOR-anon1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down7·1 year agoI use nano. Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-21 year ago4 letters < 2 letters. vi forever.
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.
minus-squareElDieLaDer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoOk but why use nano when micro literally exists
I use nano.
Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
4 letters < 2 letters.
vi forever.
Simplicity > Complexity
Nano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.
Ok but why use nano when micro literally exists