18 month project is winding down. I suspect it will have 1 use in the next 4 years we are supporting it.

The tool is basically a copy of the S3 browser, only shittier. The license for the S3 browser is only 20 bucks btw.

  • aname@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 years ago

    Most demotivating thing as a programmer: knowing your project will never be used

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think of it like a rite of passage nowadays. I remember how badly it would affect me when I started out and I can see how hard it hits juniors and mid-levei developers nowadays, it’s one of the biggest threats to morale in a team.

      • snuff@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It sucks because we watched this whole train wreck play out in slow motion.

        We told our managers from the beginning it was a waste of time and that we should focus on the more important project that will depreciate this one anyway.

        I built the tool they wanted, within the constraints of our corporate network configuration, and it worked really well. But it required the customer to change one thing about their workflow, which would require certification.

        So they slowly scoped it back and back until it does basically nothing.

        But even though the app does nothing and has no users, I still had to generate all the documents and artifacts and recovery plans etc. I wish sometimes that I would have gotten my degree in civil engineering or something more real.

    • Big P@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or knowing that what you’re working on is going to be scrapped before completion

  • Python@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 years ago

    The German government has decided that starting on October 1st of this year, they don’t want energy providers who want to call up another energy provider to just google the other company and use that number. They want an entire new system of message exchange for the sake of transmitting data like a company’s address and phone number directly to all it’s market buddies.

    I’m part of the team who had to build that shit within the last 4 months or so. It’s a neat project and everyone gained knowledge in AWS cloud stuff, but realistically, every one of our customers will use the system exactly once (as required by the government) and then never again.

    • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Could it be used as the basis for more advanced information exchange among those companies?

      • Python@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 years ago

        They already have a very advanced system to transfer actually valuable data (when/how much power needs to go to the grid, end user data, redispatch of solar panels etc etc). We’ve actually taken that complex and valid system and clipped its wings to do something way less useful :')

        • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 years ago

          We’ve actually taken that complex and valid system and clipped its wings to do something way less useful :')

          that’s … way too pragmatic for a government project

        • devil_d0c@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m in that boat now 😭

          Except I built the app from the ground up and I was super proud of it. I learned so much about PKI and S3 and made a better system for our suppliers, engineers, and customers.

          The fatal flaw was that changing supplier workflows was a complete non starter. It didn’t matter that I reduced the complexity of supplier involvement and made it easier for them to work with us, the old supplier portal HAD to be their front end, which has no api to interact with (one of the drivers for this project).

          Without the direct supplier pipeline, the tool is worse than useless. Now we need a manual process to receive, validate, and sign software before moving it to the new system. Then to deliver it requires another manual process in reverse.

          I made everyone involved life worse.

  • d6GeZtyi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 years ago

    I once worked on an interface for wifi network selection. The marketing people thought that the scan went too fast and that people would believe in consequence that it wasn’t powerful enough. So they asked me to add an artificial delay (multiple seconds) before showing the results.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      A design professor actually proposed this idea to us. Make the user feel how the computer is working, so they can appreciate the result more.

      • RonSijm@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        2 years ago

        Take the same approach with tickets: Finish one in 10 minutes? You just get a new one. Finish the same one in 2 days, and claim “Pff, that was a tough one, but I did it!” - Makes the Product Owner think the Developer is working, and appreciates the result way more

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not of they ask Jim about it and Jim stabs you in the back and says nah this should take an hour max dunno what Ron is doing.

  • glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Years ago I joined a startup as a junior developer to work on a patented security application with SSL certificates and stuff. They had been working on it for 5 years, 10 engineers and 2 guys with PhDs, it was serious business. The thing was a prototype but it was fun to work with them. I was porting their app on Mac OS X too because the founders were sure that it would also be a success on a Mac.

    Then one day I bought a HTC Desire to try this Android thing since I already knew Java. After a few tutorials, I realized that I could clone their whole app in 100 lines of code thanks to the Android API in less than a week, but it would be better, safer, and portable. I knew we were doomed. They closed the company a few months after because no one wanted their application.

  • Solemarc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 years ago

    ez! I work for a company that builds a SaaS end to end product.

    Myself and my coworker were asked to build exports for a single client. They were json exports. To start the client would take weeks/months to get back to us, their spec was very vague and their exports had some really complex logic to sort data. We’d been going back and forth with them for almost a year when they said we should give it to them “as is”. They now are the proud owners of 2 complex broken exporters.

  • Buckshot@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    A client paid us for a bespoke platform for managing invoice payments. Probably 20 man years sunk into it, they wanted to sell it to their customers but no one wanted it. They’ve just given up trying and axed it.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      OMG I just remembered this company that spent 5 years making a complex tool to use for SAP installs but nobody wanted it.

      But they didn’t just bury it like your guys, they started including it for free with other stuff just so they can claim “so and so is a customer” on the product’s webpage. 😄

      In their defense it wasn’t even such a bad idea, SAP installs suck, it’s just that nobody wanted to take a chance and would rather do them by hand As Is Tradition.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    I used to sell windows shareware, a series of apps that composed music and loops etc. I got really sick of finding cracked versions of my apps online, usually a day or two after I’d released something. So I wrote and released an app called “Magic Text Box” which consisted of just a single form with one text box on it. Less than a day later, a cracked version of it showed up.

  • varsock@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Had a client that couldn’t understand a small dataset of data. They needed “something interactive to filter and sort the data for a human to review.” We suggested putting it into an excel spreadsheet, and did it for them. Customer didn’t know how to use excel so we had to create a knock-off excel table GUI that had buttons labeled “filter and sort”.

    some people seem to have money they don’t know what to do with smh

  • YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    This was a series of decisions with good intentions that went poorly in the long run.

    Our customer wanted us to setup a system so their users could track their products from their site from a variety of carriers; but their backend was very old and difficult to work with, and their network very locked down.

    We were struggling to setup a single carrier, so we eventually decided to setup a new server with modern tooling on our own network so we could develop this and other “complicated” features with less pain, and they would only have to make a single exception to their firewall.

    Fast forward a year and:

    • They didn’t request any more “difficult” features, so the server was serving a single API
    • One of our carrier’s API keys had expired and nobody noticed because they weren’t using it, and they didn’t request support for additional carriers either
    • Somebody on their security team noticed the strange calls to our servers and demanded we moved the API to their infrastructure anyway
  • naonintendois@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Had a team of 10 working nights and weekends for a month because someone in sales sold a contract for an integration with a 3rd party that didn’t exist yet. In the years I was there after that project shipped, only 1 person even looked at the feature, one time. It never actually got used

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Stupidly bad project we were rushed relentlessly on, because - stop me if you’ve heard this one before - some dimwit promised months’ worth of work “in a couple weeks… by an intern”.

    I made it generally known that this whole thing had a snowball’s chance in Hell of getting done on time with a 4-5-man team, they did not deign to take that opinion on board. In fact, they pretty much twisted our arm into shipping some barely working bullshit, causing them to have to do a buttload of manual correction instead. I hope they’re having fun with that. :>

  • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    An RFC that essentially boiled down to saying, in excruciating detail, that I am qualified for the job I was hired for and that I can be trusted not to break the website.

  • Paradox@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    An ad hoc sorting system for a grid of tiles on an enterprise app

    Instead of sorting across row wise, it sorted columnar. So it was

    A E I M
    B F J N
    C G K O
    D H L P
    

    Instead of

    A B C D
    E F G H
    I J K L
    M N O P
    

    This was a requirement from the CEO. Since we used this project (dogfooding) we stuck a secret search box/command palette in, which you could hit . and then type the name of the thing you wanted and click it