It became the only reliable source of information I had. People posted links with a minimal amount of commentary, picking and choosing the best content from other social media networks. They’re not doing it to “build a brand” because that’s not a thing in the Fediverse. It’s too disjointed to be a place to build a newsletter subscription base.

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It takes very little effort to open and run a community here, be the change you want to see. :)

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I disagree. It’s easy if you want to use a community as your personal blog without any interaction from others. It’s hard to get an actual community running.

      • fossilesque@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        People are more likely to participate if you are. :) But if the space exists, natural discovery can happen too. You do not have to do much more than open the conversation.

        • IMALlama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I generally agree with activite communities being a self reinforcing feedback loop. That said, one of the challenges federation creates is fragmentation for “the same” community across multiple instances. As a result, each community appears relatively inactive as they’re all vying for engagement with each other.