Context (for those who don’t know): Israel and Palestine

  • Haus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It worked so well when they did the same thing for themselves and Ireland.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Because all those countries had lovely relationships among the people beforehand with absolutely no genocide and war.

        Really easy to make perfect borders that makes everyone happy.

        • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They weren’t countries. They became countries when the colonizers (and I’m using that term as accurately as possible) lumped together into managed regions and then told them they were countries with their own governments and flags. It was all “We’re going to conquer these people and these people and these people, then put Governor Fitzroy, nephew to the Prince, in charge of all of it with a big army to back him up.” Then they wrote laws and made flags and all the happy crappy stuff they do. Then they lost WWII (because pretty much everyone except for the US lost WWII), and said “you’re on your own.”

          They turned former colonies into artificial countries with governments that all but guaranteed factionalism.

          There was always war, and there always will be war. But the specific type of war we’re seeing in former colonies is because of the post-colonial situation.

          • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Exactly and when they drew the borders of those artificial nations, they had a strange talent for choosing two or more peoples who would otherwise never have formed a nation together voluntarily, so they still don´t get along today and probably never will.

            • Rambi@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              How the fuck did you get that from what you just read??

    • dreadgoat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      11 months ago

      It always works out fine for them. I don’t know why anybody says imperialism or colonialism are bad or destructive, seems to me that Britain and France and Spain and Portugal and the Dutch are all doing fine. Really weird how maps of their empires seem to overlap a lot with parts of the world that currently or recently experienced a lot of, idk let’s call it “troubles?” They must be dumb or smth

  • erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Britain has planted the seeds of hatred and bloodshed in the middle east and is now acting as if it has no responsibility towards resolving the conflict.

    It is hard to watch the British media coverage of this war acting all outraged and surprised by the violence while being proud of their historical imperial inheritance .

    • Rubanski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      Britain and France are responsible for such an enormous fuck up in Asia, Africa and the middle east, past and present, it’s probably impossible to put it in numbers. The US gets bashed a lot (deservedly), but I think those two were planting something way more devastating for generations to come

      • erranto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Britain is still one the Hydra’s snake heads in World politics even today

  • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    One group was actually living there and the other group moved in and literally ripped people from their homes.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s been happening for the last 5,000 years in that region though, since the Canaanites.

      It’s not like the Palestinians were the first there.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The Palestinians are descendants of the ancient canaanites. Most of the people in that region never left they just changed their religion at some point. This hasn’t always been happening, in Ottoman times Christians Jews and Muslims peacefully coexisted in the region.

        • Roboticide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I mean, kinda? They’re also heavily descended from 7th Century AD Arabic conquerors, but yes, many other natives may have adopted Arabic culture, language and religion at that time.

          But Jewish culture is also derived from the Canaanite culture, with arguably more overlap. Jewish culture in the region can be traced back to at least the 9th Century BC, with the literal Kingdom of Israel. So the argument of “Well who was there first?” does not necessarily favor the Palestinians over the Israelis.

          This has always been happening though. It’s not like the Ottomans took over the region peacefully. It’s been conquered and re-conquered by Babylonians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans…

          • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Palestinian culture is also derived from canaanite culture. Arabs are semitic people and follow abrahamic traditions. When places get conquered usually the ruling class changes but the lower class people stay in their homes and just change language/religion/identity. Usually the new rulers don’t try to completely wipe out the inhabitants of their new land the way israel is doing with Palestinians

  • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Also Britain: Oh good, the UN voted in favor of splitting up the land except the entire Arab League voting against the plan? Ok, sounds good, bye guys, have fun!

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s like an HOA: The council is deciding how to divide up your backyard between your neighbors. The lawn owner is the only dissenting vote and then the neighborhood wonders why they are being so hostile.

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Except in this case it costs you not just your backyard but basically your entire life.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        In this case the land owner has been renting for 100 years and doesn’t really care what the tenant thinks.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also Britain: our troops and colonial administrators are getting killed and attacked by both groups of locals, bye guys, I’m noping out of here!

  • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s working as intended, the whole Ottoman Empire was split to create manufactured internal conflict.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The Ottoman Empire split after WW1, Israel/Palestine happened in 1948. No one was anticipating Hitler doing genocide in 1919. Britain hadn’t considered a plan to award Israel to the persecuted Jewish population of Europe at that point in time.

      • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The Balfour Declaration was in 1917, and Britain began discussing support for the Zionist project in Palestine immediately after declaring war on the Ottoman Empire in 1914. The idea dates back to at least 1896 when Theodore Herzl proposed it as a solution to the “Jewish question” which, itself, was being asked as early as the 1750s.

        • Espi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I cant believe it, someone who actually knows what they are speaking about?? in my imitation Reddit forum???

          Let’s not forget that Britain also ensured the rights of Palestinians in that same declaration, I would like to see them act on that one.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The meme is wrong though and should say WW1, not WW2. The creation of the State of Israel has nothing to do with the Holocaust, all of it was planned before WW2.

  • jarfil@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    Alternate caption: “Zionists smuggling in settlers before the British mandate ended to have enough votes to create a State of Israel as a safe haven for Holocaust refugees, then getting populated mostly by Jews fleeing Arab countries out of fear of retaliation for having created the State of Israel a day early and having pushed most Palestinians out by force”

    • Haagel@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lol at all of the wannabe thirteen year old edgleords on lemmy who are so confident that they understand this extremely complicated and protracted conflict such that they can reduce it to a single generic cause but can’t even be bothered to look up which of the two world wars is the correct one to reference for their edgy meme.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not that complicated, the land in question has been owned by a conquering empire for the better part of two millenia. After WWII and emipres falling out of favor, splitting it up was decided. The locals didn’t like the jews getting a country and attacked, they lost. They mobilized for round two, and Israel hit first and won again. Since then Israel started giving back land it seized to the respective countries, in exchange for not attacking again. The region has been at an uneasy truce for 50ish years other than Palestine launching terrorist attacks every few years.

  • ChiefSinner@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Palestinians also contain Christians. Its just the modern term for gentiles in Israel now.

  • Joliflower@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    France and England seeing their current new citizens and wondering if it was worth it to fight.

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “promising to give two different groups”? You mean the natives and the colonisers? Tf is this “meme”?

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    It was still a better plan than the ottoman empire had before Britain took it from them.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, genocide turned out to be much better alternative right?

      Either way, the Ottoman empire was on its way out, and the Arabs sought to establish a United state. So whatever the ottomans were doing is irrelevant.