TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThis indie dev (Indie RPG Inkbound) is removing all microtransactions after noting that "player sentiment is trending against" themwww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1256arrow-down116
arrow-up1240arrow-down1external-linkThis indie dev (Indie RPG Inkbound) is removing all microtransactions after noting that "player sentiment is trending against" themwww.eurogamer.netTheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareWild_Mastic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down12·edit-21 year agoIt’s just cosmetics, I don’t see the problem. They have to make money for food in some way or another.
minus-squareblazera@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down4·1 year agoIts not a free game. Im not necessarily hating on cosmetic microtransactions, but they are microtransactions and theyve claimed to remove all of them.
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoThey did not make that claim. The article is just wrong. The devs said they’re removing in-game monitization and only having DLC on the store page. It’s functionally identical I assume, but there’s less pressure on players playing the game.
It’s just cosmetics, I don’t see the problem. They have to make money for food in some way or another.
Its not a free game. Im not necessarily hating on cosmetic microtransactions, but they are microtransactions and theyve claimed to remove all of them.
They did not make that claim. The article is just wrong. The devs said they’re removing in-game monitization and only having DLC on the store page. It’s functionally identical I assume, but there’s less pressure on players playing the game.