Nah, don’t even give it credibility of thought. This is propaganda for sure. “Oh the Chinese don’t want you to have data centers, give us all your water and electricity so the Chinese don’t win pleeease”
China may not want the US to lead the AI races, but don’t forget these AI companies are trying to destroy communities in the name of corporate profits.
Having advanced AI is a key national security tool for any nations. While it is true that data centres are environmentally and socially damaging, it is to China’s advantage that the Western public turns sour on AI and data centres. So yes, both can be true at the same time.
Have you heard of…China? And cameras? Social credits?
They’ve been putting cameras and microphones in for decades over there. We’re just now scratching the surface with flock, can only imagine what it’s like over there with ai cameras now.
It isn’t just surveillance. It’s about innovating. What created a strong tech sector in the west was innovation. China wants us to put down the new thing so they can build the patents and develop the sector. It isn’t great that AI exists. But rejecting it is going to hurt more than if we use it.
For who?
That’s how innovation happens. It’s like saying you don’t think it’s useful to read all the books on a subject. You can’t just open a page to exactly what you need.
I see a lot of you phrasing things like “whatever it is we getting” but are we all really ignorant to the reality of the way these tools increase productivity? Like that’s just putting your head into the ground. When I was younger the left was where I thought wise people were.
I mean I would not put it past them, but I still hate the slop factories. Two things can be true at once.
Nah, don’t even give it credibility of thought. This is propaganda for sure. “Oh the Chinese don’t want you to have data centers, give us all your water and electricity so the Chinese don’t win pleeease”
China may not want the US to lead the AI races, but don’t forget these AI companies are trying to destroy communities in the name of corporate profits.
Having advanced AI is a key national security tool for any nations. While it is true that data centres are environmentally and socially damaging, it is to China’s advantage that the Western public turns sour on AI and data centres. So yes, both can be true at the same time.
yeah clearly because Iran just ate shit against the US
oh but .ml so this will just end up being water off a duck’s brain
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
“There’s no evidence, but I’m already deeply sinophobic, so I’ll that assume it’s true!”
China loves data centers though. How else are they gonna enable their mass surveillance?
You know American surveillance is 100x worse right? You’ve heard of Snowden and Assange?
Have you heard of…China? And cameras? Social credits?
They’ve been putting cameras and microphones in for decades over there. We’re just now scratching the surface with flock, can only imagine what it’s like over there with ai cameras now.
Google the social credit thing and then get back to me.
Also you know you have a credit score too, and it affects where you can live, what car you can drive, and where you can work, lol.
Google which country has the most surveillance…how is this even an argument lmao
Google is literally part of your government surveillance 😂
Any updates on the social credit thing? Did you read about how that was bullshit propaganda, lol?
Believing the US somehow has worse surveillence then China of all places…definitely some bullshit propaganda, agreed 👍
Lol, k
Western liberals are the most profoundly unserious people on earth
It isn’t just surveillance. It’s about innovating. What created a strong tech sector in the west was innovation. China wants us to put down the new thing so they can build the patents and develop the sector. It isn’t great that AI exists. But rejecting it is going to hurt more than if we use it.
I’d argue that the current capitalism speedrun of shoving ai into literally everything is just as bad as rejecting it, if not worse.
For who? That’s how innovation happens. It’s like saying you don’t think it’s useful to read all the books on a subject. You can’t just open a page to exactly what you need.
Yes, this is a shitty space race. Instead of putting a man on the moon we get … whatever it is we’re getting.
I see a lot of you phrasing things like “whatever it is we getting” but are we all really ignorant to the reality of the way these tools increase productivity? Like that’s just putting your head into the ground. When I was younger the left was where I thought wise people were.