Germany’s Bundesrat, the upper house of parliament, backed a bill to criminalize the denial of Israel’s right to exist on Friday, a motion that constitutional experts said could jeopardize freedom of expression.

According to the bill, anyone denying Israel’s right to exist or calling for its abolition would be punished with a prison sentence of up to five years under the regulation. The bill will be examined by the Bundestag, the lower house of parliament, after its summer recess.

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Our government sure does. Their enablers probably don’t actively love it, they just can’t be arsed to actually think about the implications of just voting CxU. The reasons range from “I’ve always voted for them” (that just makes it worse) and “they’re Christians” (the fuck they are) over various forms of “I like the status quo” (which they’re making worse for everyone not already rich) to “the evil bad green / left parties are gonna take away my house, my car, make me eat tofu and whatever other propaganda bullshit my favourite sensationalist rag has told me that I believe uncritically”.

      They don’t love genocide, they just love not having to care about politics and the cunts they elect abuse that merrily. Of course, there are also genuine genocide fans, but for the most part, it’s more a habitual complacency with a chunk of domestic fearmongering.

      As a democratic body, we’ve been slacking off for decades. Now the bill is coming due and the youth get to foot it. We get thrown in with the misguided, the lazy and the assholes. And the worst part is how many of us fall into the “domestic misery -> xenophobia” trap and prove you right.

      I can’t even argue with your conclusion. The difference between actively supporting and passively permitting is academic when the results are these pieces of shit in our government.

  • raicon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    14 days ago

    This whole shit about “Right to exist” is extremely absurd.

    Never before, anywhere else on the planet, no other country was ever questioned to have the right to exist.

    Fuck these genocidal colonialists, trying to smooth ambiguous sentences with acceptance for their genocide.

    • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      14 days ago

      exactly. does Genovia have a right to exist? that’s the fictional European kingdom from The Princess Diaries. it’s doesn’t exist. but does it have a right to?

      • DisasterTransport@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Genovia is a critical friend and ally to the United States. I stand with Genovia, both because of our shared values, which are so fundamental to the founding of both our nations, and I believe the bonds between the people of the United States and the people of Genovia are unbreakable, and we can never let anyone drive a wedge between us.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Never before, anywhere else on the planet, no other country was ever questioned to have the right to exist.

      Even right now Russia questions Ukraine’s right to exist, US questions Venezuela, Colombia, Cuba and Greenland’s right to exist. Britain has in living memory questioned Ireland’s right to exist.

      Israel absolutely has a right to exist and it’s fine that’s put to law.

      Palestine ALSO has a right to exist and it should also be put to law.

  • wheezy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Can we first know what “right to exist” means for the context of a nation state? Surely, Nazi Germany didn’t have a “right to exist”. So, surely it’s not a universal right like a person’s right to exist? This means there are things a state can do that revoke it’s “right to exist”? So, what does it actually mean?

    • All states (even Nazi Germany) have a “right to exist” and it cannot be revoked.

    • No states have a “right to exist”.

    • All states have a right to exist until some defined violation that revokes that right.

    • It’s a meaningless phrase that is only used in the context of defending a genocidal apartheid state.

    I’m leaning towards thinking they are using the last definition.

  • treesartlife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I do not recognize terrorist states. Free Palestine. And fuck you Germany. You never changed.

    • mysteryhumpf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      14 days ago

      So you also don’t recognize Palestine because of the atrocities of October 7th? I think there should be protection for both states and for all human beings living there.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I think there should be protection for both states and for all human beings living there.

        Cool. How do you proposing twisting the arm of the fucking apartheid regime that is currently engaging in genocide to get it to comply with that aspiration? Really open to suggestions.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    What about Palestine’s right to exist? They going to pass a similar law about that?..no?.. Didn’t think so.

  • BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    That’s some Zionist bullshit. I guarantee that any criticism of Israel would end up being lumped in.

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Already is in Germany. It’s even illegal to protest in Germany in a different language, and that rule was specifically made to target the anti-genocide protests using Palestinian freedom slogans that have been around for decades

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    People OK, government bad.

    Israel should exist as a pluralistic society.

    Apartheid Israel needs to undergo some very painful changes, starting with ending their genocide against Palestinians.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Israel is a settler colonial project, it fundamentally cannot exist as a pluralistic society.

      Palestine used to be a pluralistic society.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Settler colonial projects absolutely can become pluralistic societies.

        <gestures wildly at South Africa>

    • Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      Israel should exist as a pluralistic society.

      Pissrael is colonial apartheid white supremacist project. It needs to be completely dismantled and destroyed.

      Many many people should be tortured and executed, all the rest can be imprisoned and forced to reconstruct every building destroyed. The sentence ends when Palestine is fully rebuilt.

      Palestine should be the only state and we should mind our own business on how they should govern their land.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        14 days ago

        Okay but where do you put the jews afterwards? Shall we build camps in Europe again?

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            I’m saying those people need a place to live too.

            I’m not really much of a zionist, I actually believe both the Palestinians and the Jews can have their own countries and Israel shouldn’t be expanding obviously.

            I live in a country that was literally declared judenfrei in the brief amount of time the nazis occupied us. I can see why they need their own nation state to feel safe. It just shouldn’t be what it is right now.

            • Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Palestine used to have all kinds of different faith co-living together, including jews! Again you are conflating religion and nationality, the land of your birth with the name of your preferred “sky daddy”.

              Should we give christians their christland? Buddhist their Buddaland?

              No, Jews DO NOT NEED THIER OWN THEOCRATIC NATION. Nobody NEEDS a nation. You are born into one.

              We need to respect other people’s religion and stop being fucking religious supremacists.

              So again, jews (like all religious people) can live wherever the fuck they like, including Palestine, respecting others people’s faiths.

              People involved economically, ideologically and practically in the creation and continuation of the apartheid fascist project called israel, need to pay back with sweat and blood.

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                Before WWII, there were under 100k of them in Palestine, they were a small minority. That number is now millions in the same territory. Why do you think they shouldn’t have their own government and their own country?

                Also Jewish doesn’t only mean someone of a particular religion, it’s also an ethnicity. Do you think nazis cared if you were practicing? Just having the big nose would’ve been enough.

                I’m not saying Palestine shouldn’t exist, but I do think that the people who consider themselves Jews should have their own country too. Why shouldn’t it be in the land they were kicked out of originally? There’s plenty of space there.

                The thing I do have a problem with is what’s going on in west bank and Gaza (and Lebanon). They have their Lebensraum, they don’t need more of it.

                • Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  there were under 100k of them in Palestine, they were a small minority. That number is now millions in the same territory.

                  So what?

                  Why do you think they shouldn’t have their own government and their own country?

                  This is non-sense, if a different ethnicity is above a certain number in a country we should split it? Is this your point? Are you normal?

                  Jewish doesn’t only mean someone of a particular religion, it’s also an ethnicity

                  No it’s not, it’s a religion. Not a race, not an ethnicity. Stop repeating propaganda from fascists. Benjamin Milekowski (Netanyahu) is a Polish cunt fuck inbred who has nothing to do with the Middle East or Palestine.

                  I do think that the people who consider themselves Jews should have their own country too

                  Why the fuck should they? If I consider myself Zoroastrian I should also have my country? Again jews were living peacefully with “arabs” just 150 years ago.

                  You can not claim a territory because your people used to live there 2000 years ago. It does not work like that. If it was, the romans should colonize half of Europe and you should be okay with it.

                  You are helping and justifying the killing of thousands of civilians today because of events happened thousands of years ago. Can you imagine if everyone would do that?

                  You are repeating manufactured propaganda you don’t understand, for god knows what reason, helping a white suprematist theocratic colonial project killing thousands of civilians. Congrats.

                  Either don’t partecipate in the discussion or study better, ignorant israeli cuck.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 days ago

    Lmao there is a huge difference between “existing” and “actively deliberately genociding a people and culture they believe are inferior”

      • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        No, antisemitism (or really any kind of discriminatory sentiment) is / has been punishable by law already. Among other things, there is precedence that denying Israels right to exist can count as such. While German law is not based on precedence, it shows that it was de facto illegal to do so.

        What is legal is to criticise Israel and call out their crimes against humanity, but the political bubble has somehow been convinced it’s not that bad and they are the good ones.

        • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I don’t see Germany making laws about other state’s rights to exist. And also, states don’t have rights to exist.

          Don’t be a dumb dumb protecting stupid laws.

          • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Don’t be a dumb dumb and read stating a plain fact about law as defense of a new law that seems to be mostly symbolic. Or an expression of my take on states for that matter, because neither has happened here.

            • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              Then I apologize on both counts. I understood your matter of fact tone as normalizing the overzealous and biased enforcement of anti-hate laws.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            I don’t read this as defending it, just explaining the German government’s view of antisemitism.

            I’ll go further and note that this broad definition adopted by the government led to multiple instances of Jews being arrested for antisemitism for peacefully protesting the apartheid. I’m not defending the law at all, just lamenting that it’s sadly not new, as far as I can tell.

            So I guess I also want to know if anything changed or if they just wanted to pat themselves on the back for formally codifying it.

            • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              That was my bad if they weren’t defending the law (see my comment to their response).

              And yes, I’m aware of the irony that German Jewish people were arrested for their stance against the Palestinian genocide.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I don’t know what “Israel’s right to exist” means. Like, I believe that Israel should exist as a secular, democratic country with fully equal rights for all people regardless of their ethnicity or religion, with the right of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to return, with reparations for the victims of genocide and apartheid, with full accountability for the perpetrators of crimes against humanity, and with a national project overseen by the international community that will effect the deep institutional and educational deradicalization of the population, including a complete political and institutional repudiation of all kind of jewish-supremacist forms of zionism, as well as a German-style Erinnerungskultur, and by having as its Staatsräson a commitment to the defence and security of Palestine. Is it jail for me in the Bundesrepublik or not?

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yes, jail for you. German law is about Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state (and everything that comes with that which they don’t speak about and ignore).