If it’s really a job interview then why didn’t the guy move on to the next candidate
Mr. Ossoff is a beast - only in the best way!
If I answered a question like that in an interview for a job at McDonalds, I’d be laughed right the fuck out of the room. This should be instantly disqualifying, but in this admin, brazen dishonesty and cronyism is a must have.
That’s one of the most frustrating parts about all this, so few people are rational, so few people have standards or honor.
It should be allowed to demand a duel if someone dissembles and refuses to answer questions in situations like this.
That would just put psychopaths with good reflexes in charge even more than they already are.
In other administrations, too. The definition of truth belongs to the majority holder.
If the opposition to the GOP do not get a majority, and really a super-majority is what’s truly needed… If that doesn’t happen, there’s no salvation for the United States.
I’d argue that it’s been gone for a while, but I simply cannot give up yet.
For there to be a real path out of this they need to be willing to strike a stake into the heart of the republican vampire party:
- Fully reform the supreme court with sane people who will overturn citizens united.
(Personally I would add every goddamn american citizen to the supreme court because its a lifetime appointment and the public would be way better the corrupt nutjobs currently running the asylum)
Additionally like 3 of the following:
- Commit to passing some real ass electoral reforms to enforce the 14th ammendment.
- Commit to reforming the way congressional districts are drawn or eliminate them entirely with proportional voting mandates
- Bring DC and Puerto Rico in as states. Threaten to offer cuba statehood and reparations if republicans invade it based on some kind of generational grudge held by rich casino owner’s grandparents.
- ensure the electoral college is handled on a proportional basis, if not eliminated entirely.
And then looking to the future:
- address the corruption stemming from the billionaire classes
- use billionaire money to directly pay reparations to people placed in camps by trump admin
- prosecute ice agents involved in murders.
- ensure all tech companies remotely linked to social media, search, surveillance or data collection are run as non profit utilities under laws similar to those we require for power companies.
What do you think Citizens United did? Overturning it would have very little effect. The things you don’t like about money in politics, super PACs, corporate person hood existed before that case and are heavily entrenched.
Otherwise I totally agree, having PR not be a state is a disgrace, and having DC controlled by the federal government and without full representation is a farce.
Citizens united is the largest of a series of court cases that skewed power to the ultra wealthy. The mention of that is a starting point but beyond that it would allow more strict regulation of how corporations can spend their money.
Realistically there’s over a dozen supreme court cases that need to be overturned and if you want an idea what those are at this point I highly recommend a podcast like 5-4
This is great. I wrote a platform in 2016 that included a lot of this, but I realize now that I should update my stance on these things to accommodate the new landscape.
Unpopular opinion — The electoral college and Senate can stay as-is. At a glance it might seem weird to give votes to land, but on the other hand you shouldn’t want every state between Utah and the Mississippi to become the country’s public dumping ground.
Yeah, there are problems, but the other reforms might be enough. Overturning Citizens United, cleansing the Supreme Court of RV bribes and corruption, eliminating gerrymandering, and proportional elections should cover enough that we don’t need to eliminate Nebraska’s votes.
An autistic person simply could not do this. Its not in our nature to ride trump’s dick so hard that we could deny very obvious things.
Obstructing the government is my special interest
What a piece of shit.
Well, it is the US.
Isn’t it humiliating to be unable to answer this basic question
His delivery really nails him.
Love the questioning. I was hoping for a dismissive “ok we’ll call you back”.
Kind of annoying that they don’t ask them who won in 2024 or 2016 too. Or first. Or a really old one like Reagan.
Yeah, ‘16 and ‘24 aren’t really contested in Trump’s mind because Trump won those (maybe; lawsuits are pending, etc) but the ‘20 election is contentious for fascist fucks everywhere.
Yeah but from an interviewing perspective it’s a win-win. Either the guy answers the question for those elections more clearly, showing that he only has a problem answering the one about 2020 and therefore clearly doing it because of the orange man, or he still refuses and he looks like he can’t answer simple questions.
He didn’t win the popular vote in 2016, which is hilarious.
These people are disconnected from reality and need real psychological help. In the meantime, this behavior is not acceptable for anyone in any kind of official position. Hell, this amount of deflection wouldn’t even be acceptable if he were trying to be a fucking barista.
No offense at all meant to baristas. You have likely worked harder than this clown ever will.
Pathetic. My last shit had more integrity, and I have diarrhea.
I could never do a job like that because I’d just tell the truth.
Well, I hope he didn’t get the job.
He will
This man should have been taken away in a straight jacket.
Edit: also, the whole Jon Ossoff questioning is here, at 1:46:05. Good to hear in it’s entirety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9BYMPKDB3g
For convenience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9BYMPKDB3g&t=1h46m5s
Post-truth Amerikkka
