• Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If your choice is no treatment vs suicide, that’s not really a choice, either.

    Also you can’t really give someone a choice in life vs death when their mental state is unstable.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Treatment is an option. And people are evaluated before being allowed to end their lives this way.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ideally. But if that’s the case, why limit it to people with drug addictions? Why limit it to the vulnerable and mentally impaired? Drug addicts aren’t usually terminal patients. What if this was applied but only to overweight people? Or smokers? Or the poor?

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re free to ponder those questions, but what California and Canada are doing has nothing to do with the Nazis.