ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agoUncle Bob becoming even worse:lemmy.worldimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1371arrow-down19
arrow-up1362arrow-down1imageUncle Bob becoming even worse:lemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squaresirdorius@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·17 hours agoIsn’t this just the natural evolution of TDD? Write tests, pass them, don’t care about how garbage the code is to make them pass
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·15 hours agoBut if the ai writes the tests and you don’t read them, how would you know if that’s 100 lines of assertTrue(true) ?
minus-squareTheKingBee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·14 hours agodeleted by creator
minus-squareDisasterTransport@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·14 hours agoIf it’s stupid but it works it’s still stupid and you’re lucky
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-213 hours agoAnd, if you deploy/share it, you’re both lucky and stupid. ☝🏼 Well, the luck’ll invariably run out on that path, but the stupid certainly seems tenacious.
Isn’t this just the natural evolution of TDD? Write tests, pass them, don’t care about how garbage the code is to make them pass
But if the ai writes the tests and you don’t read them, how would you know if that’s 100 lines of assertTrue(true) ?
deleted by creator
If it’s stupid but it works it’s still stupid and you’re lucky
And, if you deploy/share it, you’re both lucky and stupid. ☝🏼
Well, the luck’ll invariably run out on that path, but the stupid certainly seems tenacious.