• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      And the video’s rating was plainly visible so you could use it to make the decision whether the video was even worth your click.

      The shovelware AI slop video channels wouldn’t be such a problem today if we still had that.

    • sasquash@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      27 days ago

      and search results showed only videos related to your search. recommendations on the side were similar videos and not some unrelated bullshit. it was so much better.

      • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        Honestly if someone remade an old YouTube alternative I think it would take off.

        It’s what I wish PeerTube was, but I’m not sure if that will ever take off sadly.

        Lack of advertising dollars is definitely an impediment to video platform alternatives…

        I remember a time when people just posted silly little shitty drawn videos just for the fun of it. Not saying creators shouldn’t be compensated for their hard work, I just feel like something was lost with the monetization of every little thing.

          • banazir@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            People really fail to understand what a truly colossal undertaking a site like YouTube is. It’s a technological wonder that they are able to process that much data and serve it so efficiently. Hate YouTube all you want, I do, but the engineers at Google are fucking magicians.

            • feddylemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              27 days ago

              Last I heard it was something on the order of 700 hours of video content uploaded per minute. Insane.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            26 days ago

            Maybe when the AI bubble bursts, people will buy up abandoned data centers for pennies on the dollar and repurpose them for a better Youtube alternative. And maybe Margot Robbie will see this comment and fall in love with me.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          27 days ago

          Which I really hate, because it means when you get into some specific interest, YouTube basically stops showing you anything else.

          Hey YouTube! Those interests I was into last week, last month, I’m still into them! Please don’t railroad me like that!

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    27 days ago

    You sweet summer child, back in my day YouTube had a five star rating system and video response functionality.

    • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      27 days ago

      Gotta say, don’t miss video responses. It was nearly all irrelevant content and people trying to advertise their own channels

      • banazir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        Perfectly true. It would’ve been nice, if it wasn’t so inherently abusable. We can’t have nice things.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        It’s more complicated than that. The button still exists even without the add-on and the back end factors it in and I think shows the creator, but doesn’t show it to the front end. So the add-on doesn’t have the real numbers but there still are real numbers

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        It’s a good enough approximation. Do you really need to know if the massively downvoted video had 357,923 downvotes or 357,924?

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Tidal has a no-AI button, if it helps. They’ve just introduced it. That’s music taken care of, I guess. It’s something.

      YouTube is letting people mark their videos as AI or not AI and I assume doing nothing with it? I think I’ve stumbled upon an AI video or two on YouTube but I didn’t see any labels?

      EDIT: Oh, fuck, are they just asking us to label our videos “non-AI” so they don’t train their own AI on AI slop? Fuck.

    • istdaslol@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      No the API is dead. The extension everyone is using calculates their own dislike number by inferring from the extension users who disliked the video

        • istdaslol@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Afaik it’s only for the YT-Studio backend, so creators can see the dislikes but there is no public access to that data

            • istdaslol@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              I meant that while the button is still there the Data is only available for the uploader via the Studio backend. The public API is dead, wich I omitted in the original comment for simplicity

              • lugal@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                26 days ago

                How is:

                the Data is only available for the uploader via the Studio backend.

                different from:

                it just doesn’t show numbers because YouTube is a coward.

                ?

                You were more technical than the top level comment and framed it as a disagreement.

                • istdaslol@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  Because the second can implies the data is still available but not displayed. I wanted to specify that the data isn’t available (for the public). I don’t disagree with the top per se but wanted to clear up the ambiguity

  • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    back in my day, you posted about your life in your geocities website! And you wrote the html on notepad and had to include an animated gif that told people to email you, cause that was the style at the time.

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Ah, I remember when you paused and the whole video was buffering. You could have multiple tabs open and watch the video when it was done. No matter what kind of connection you had, you could simply wait for the video to finish downloading in the background and watch it without problems.

    No ads, a 5-star rating system, 100% buffering, and mostly enthusiasts posting, no profit-driven incentives. We didn’t know how good we had it.

    I hate the way YouTube now gives millions of dollars to people exploiting children watching videos - be it slop factories or ‘influencer’ preying on their insecurities.

    In a just society YouTube would have been destroyed as a pseudo-monopoly ages ago.

  • Dookieman12@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    27 days ago

    We’re all being punished because Google’s feelings got hurt when we didn’t like the 2018 YouTube Rewind enough. That was the end of the dislike button and the YouTube Rewind altogether.