• FullPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, not really. The type of gun doesn’t make a difference aside from the length of the barrel, but that’s pretty negligible for anything remotely normal (i.e. not a ~4-10inch barrel in this case).

    Same thing with the cartridge/bullet, total energy varies bullet to bullet, but again, in a negligible way.

    The real explanation is that the damage people expect from this cartridge is caused by hydrostatic shock: the shockwave caused by the bullet entering and slowing down significantly (transferring energy). Hitting somewhere soft and without much muscle mass, the side of the neck, let the bullet pass through without transferring a ton of energy.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      The type of gun can matter, for example an autoloading rifle is not quite as powerful as a bolt action rifle because it uses some of the energy to cycle the bolt and load the next bullet. The shooter allegedly used a bolt action rifle, though, which should basically be “the most powerful” type of rifle.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        OMG, listening to some of y’all talk about this shit that have no experience or business trying to explain about ballistics and rifles and ammunition etc. is just hilarious.