It’s unclear how such an action would help lower U.S. borrowing costs.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure, but situations evolve that change the meaning.

    15 years ago, being an independent contractor was relatively rare and pretty deliberate. Now that’s just being registered with Uber, Lyft, Doordash. So lots of people stop becoming “unemployed” and become “independent contractors” due to what is essentially a cultural shift. Being an “employed” independent contractor is trivial now, but says nothing about income prospects.

    The side job scenario certainly isn’t new, so your point is taken there, that number of jobs “created” always could have been either good or bad without context.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      All true

      The reason that economists use GDP (probably switching back to GNP in the post Trump world) is because it is easily available and easily sniff tested.

      A better measurement would be appreciated if made available