• lokalhorst@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    Top left: Lindsay Clancy - Apparently strangled her 3 kids, there is an ongoing process in the US right now

    Top right: Osama Bin Laden - Former boss of the Taliban in Afghanistan and responsible for 9/11

    Bottom left: Adolf Hitler - Leader of the German NSDAP and responsible for the Holocaust and WW2

    Bottom right: Sean Combs aka P. Diddy - US musician, multiple cases of sexual violence and rape, and proliferation of prostitution

  • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hmm. I think Adolf was not bad to children (or maybe I am missing some information) and debating him would be fun for me, too.

    Arabs are usually too patriotic and uninterested in children. Diddy is too diddly. And no idea who top left is.

      • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        48 minutes ago

        I believe you don’t understand how Hitler’s mind worked. He was clearly pro-life, just not pro-every-life. Similar to what happens on a daily basis in a lot of countries. Ethnic cleansing was done because of ethnicity, not because of age.

        Also about the concentration camps, I don’t know enough about this part. Was it a clear order and idea of Hitler? Or was the idea to get rid of jews, but the infrastructure was not ready for this amount of people, and thus someone like Goebbels brought the idea of just getting rid of them locally? I remember reading somewhere that at the beginning, they tried to deport the people, but soon realized they were not able to do that in a timely manner.

        PS: I had to puke a little describing Hitler as pro-life under the circumstances, unfortunately it is technocally right. He loved people, also children. Just hated jews.

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 minutes ago

          You took my reply way too seriously.

          I’m not a historian so I can’t really debate this. Of course Hitler was selectively pro-life, the whole nazi shit is exactly that (and why many back then didn’t want to see what happened initially - after all the Nazis gave white people “Kraft durch Freude” and holidays for their first time). Same crap happens in the USA right now, and of course many other countries. Though fortunately for democratic US-citizens still fighting the Trump regime is far less competent than the OG Nazis.

          “kid-friendly” is a term encompassing all kids though. If you’re unfriendly to some kids you’re not kid-friendly. This applies to nazis, racists, religious assholes, ableists etc. all alike.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Tbh the biggest danger that would come from having bin Laden babysit your kids is the possibility of them being killed in a drone strike.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Just leave them home alone.

    Alternatively, you reckon Osama could teach them basic engineering skills? If they are making phone-activated landmines surely they can put up some fun RF experiments.

  • starik@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Kind of like how when a restaurant reopens after an embarrassing health code violation, and it’s now the cleanest restaurant in town, Lindsay Clancy for me.

    I mean, what are the chances she’d do that twice?

    • QueenHawlSera@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Looks like we are.

      sigh

      No one’s arguing for her to be found innocent, Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity doesn’t mean you go home

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Osama bin Laden loved his kids. He was hard on them, for sure, he was basically what you imagine when you think of a deep south US prepper survivalist - a bit eccentric and paranoid, but intelligent - he would be taking his kids on long hikes, teaching them how to sleep in the desert with only sand as a blanket, but he did it out of a deep desire to protect them and give them skills to survive.

    • dan69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The man had multiple wives and multiple kids. All of which where taken care of financially- so ya seconded

    • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Western educated man who is pissed off at the US for abandoning his political ascension? Slightly better than a meth addicted turboracist, a crazy murderer, and a child molester. I doubt bin Laden is going to be able to do much opinion changing in a single evening and I doubt that he’d outright kill or molest them.

      • gastroglizzy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Bin Laden fathered 24 children, the first of which was with his first cousin when she was 16 and he was 17. They went on to have ten more children. The other 13 were spread amongst five other wives. They also found several beheading videos on his computer. He also believed muslims should kill any US civilians they find until the US withdraws support for Israel.

        I think definitely killing and maybe molestation would be on the table.

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Not even remotely close. I saw him first and before seeing the rest of the faces I already knew that this was an usian thing so he was going to be “a major evil”.

      Fact is, aside religion, we’d have a lot in common, including hating the US so, if any, it would give for an interesting evening for my kids and a more interesting post-evening chat with him.

      The other 3, in my eyes, are way, waaaaaaaaaaaaaay worse.

    • gastroglizzy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You must not know very much about Bin Laden. Give his Wikipedia articles a quick skim. Your kids wouldn’t survive the night. If they survive an hour, it’s because they decided to kill them slowly.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    If they have blonde hair and blue eyes, uncle Adolf is the safest bet.

  • 3daybanwithdrawl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Did Hitler actually do any killing people himself, or did he just have other people do it for him? If it’s the latter then I pick him, because I think he’s too lazy to actually do anything.

  • ☭SaltyIcetea☭ @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    ngl, since im a white, cis, heterosexual, non-jewish, german: probably hitler. i dont think he was the kinda guy that would kill children just because he could. if these children happened to have like, a jewish mother, things would definitely look different