• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s far easier to do this all client side. It’s it spotting to detect when a resource load fails and log to the console?

    Spying implies that someone, or at least some process, is watching me and my behaviour. But there is more to it, because that just describes a site working.

    • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      but client side requires the client to cooperate. and the client is regularly not under your control.

      I can’t make sense of your second sentence.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The client needs to “cooperate” to do anything, including showing whatever it is says “please don’t block our ads :'(”

        I mean that merely observing behaviour is not spying, because that covers any interaction. So what makes this spying?

      • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Unless you’re blocking Javascript, they have control to see what elements are loaded.