floofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoTrump's Voter Raids Have Begunwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1310arrow-down13
arrow-up1307arrow-down1external-linkTrump's Voter Raids Have Begunwww.motherjones.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down17·12 hours agotautologicallly, non-voters did not vote.
minus-squareagent_nycto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·9 hours agoYou get it was phrased that way specifically for the adjustment factor, right?
minus-squarenao@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·9 hours agoby abstaining they lowered the total number of votes by one, effectively helping the winner of the vote
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·9 hours agoso you understand that they didn’t vote
minus-squarenao@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 hours agoDepends on your definition of “vote”. In the literal sense, they didn’t.
minus-squaregreen_link@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·10 hours agoNot casting a vote is a vote.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down10·10 hours agoexplicitly, it is not.
minus-squareBarqsHasBite@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down5·11 hours agoExcept, they did vote for this.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down13·11 hours agoby definition, they did not vote
minus-squareBarqsHasBite@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·10 hours agoExcept, they did vote for this. Kthx.
minus-squareLucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·7 hours agoYou are being deliberately obtuse and intellectually disingenuous here.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·7 hours agoI’m stating plain facts.
minus-squareDarkFuture@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours agoLet’s find a term that makes you happy. How about, they CONDONED what’s happening by not voting.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·6 hours agothat’s making a leap of logic. all we know for sure is that they didn’t vote.
tautologicallly, non-voters did not vote.
You get it was phrased that way specifically for the adjustment factor, right?
by abstaining they lowered the total number of votes by one, effectively helping the winner of the vote
so you understand that they didn’t vote
Depends on your definition of “vote”. In the literal sense, they didn’t.
Not casting a vote is a vote.
explicitly, it is not.
Except, they did vote for this.
by definition, they did not vote
Except, they did vote for this. Kthx.
they didn’t vote
You are being deliberately obtuse and intellectually disingenuous here.
I’m stating plain facts.
Let’s find a term that makes you happy.
How about, they CONDONED what’s happening by not voting.
that’s making a leap of logic. all we know for sure is that they didn’t vote.