• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Although the jury concluded that Meta had over 43 million violations of the state’s unfair practices act, with each transgression carrying a civil penalty as high as $5,000, a New Mexico judge was responsible for determining the ultimate fine. The Wednesday filing showed that the state was awarded $219.5 billion, but the penalty was ultimately reduced to $25 billion.

    So the $25 billion judgment is a judicial reduction from the jury award of $219.5 billion.

    I also like this decision from the judge:

    The judge added that interest on the penalty shall accrue at the rate of 15% each year until the fine is paid off in full.

    Meta will likely appeal, but not only does that not guarantee a reduction in the judgment, if they drag this out for years, New Mexico gets paid out even more.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I doubt New Mexico will ever see the money.

      What are they going to do to actually punish Facebook for not paying?

      Large corporations are somewhat immune from actual consequence these days.

      • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They can geoban Meta. Since pretty much who uses Meta services doesn’t know how to use VPNs, there’s a lot of pressure put on them.

    • doleo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      the state was awarded $219.5 billion, but the penalty was ultimately reduced to $25 billion.

      would have been a better headline, tbh

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Meh, I like the $25 billion headline because its the realistic result of the trial. Citing the $219.5 billion number in the headline would be clickbait because, while true with specific verbiage, it doesn’t actually have any impact or expectation of that award actually occurring.

        • doleo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          No, I mean more like “Meta to pay just 10% of original fine” - So people get an idea of how their judiciary system really works.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Even that would be clickbait though, because $219.5 billion isn’t the “original fine”, its the jury guidance. Its part of the sausage making of the justice system. The jury has a range of the fine per incident they can choose from to suggest a judgment. The judge then uses that jury guidance with additional info to determine the actual judgement. In this case $25 billion is the “original fine”.

            • doleo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              You’re technically correct, but I still disagree with you on this. My reasoning is that I think the real story here is that meta has wormed its way out of being punished adequately, again.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                This is where it becomes subjective. For some,Meta being “punished adequately” would mean the complete liquidation of the company and charges for executives in front of the International Criminal Court in the Hague for crimes against humanity.

                A $25 billion award would be 41% of Meta’s annual profit. That is substantial!

                • _hovi_@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  At least it’s not just a slap on the wrist, but I like the sound of the first paragraph!

              • ripcord@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                “You’re correct but you weren’t negative enough so I disagree”