• plateee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      “But what if it means two in a row!?!?!!?”

      That’s a literal claim from some Republicans.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No no it has to be the first term, interrupted, then second, then third. The reason? Because they need to exclude Obama from running again.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And why wouldn’t it be?

        To be a Republican is to be a grifter/conman/shitstain. Cheating is always on the table.

        I know it’s hard to plan for all eventualities, but I really wish the founding fathers had covered things in a little more detail.

        “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice…regardless of whether the terms are consecutive.”

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The founding fathers didn’t come up with the 22nd amendment, that was done in the late 40’s after FDR was elected four times in a row. The founding fathers intentionally left that one open, I think

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Yes, it was intentional. They wanted the Constitution to be revised and expanded as necessary, rather than being bad law set in stone. They were well aware they couldn’t foresee the many issues that would come up, especially over time. That’s why the Constitution is often described as a “framework” for the US’s “laboratories of democracy”.