• AeronMelon@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s code for “you are not only well off enough to care for yourself, you’re well off enough to care for another adult and at least one child.”

    Hence the need for a house.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That’s my point though. Marriage is no that. You don’t care for a partner like you did in the 50s

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s even worse then, because back then a single income household was all that was needed.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The point is that you should have the financial freedom to support a family on a single income. The “marriage” part isn’t what’s important.

        Double income, no kids, used to be a trope where the couple had all kinds of time and money to do whatever. Now it’s almost the minimum to not be homeless.