All their responses are generated, no conscience there, just AI. “Another brick in the wall” hits stronger than ever now.

  • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    don’t forget that frequent LLM use erodes patience and skills. even with the training ethics and environmental ethics set aside, they make you measurably dumber.

    LLM users consistently underperform at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This kinda gets philosophy-of-cognative-science-ey, but it kinda smells like “measuring a fish by its tree climbing ability”. Or maybe like goodharts law.

      There are many different kinds of smart, is the kind of smart they’re measuring the one that will be relevant?

      Again, I don’t want to carry too much water for AI, but I also don’t want to propagate arguments that also apply to other tools I like. Consider: externalizing memory. Without the tool you used to capture that memory, you’re completely unable to function. Dependency on it reduces your ability to remember things yourself. By many measures, it makes your dumber and less productive. But I wouldn’t personally consider taking notes to be detrimental.
      So I want to be very careful when we make claims that externalizing some aspect of our cognition makes us worse somehow.