like would it have been better if we did that?

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The issue isn’t creating the tools, but making them easy enough for mass adoption. Big tech got big, not because they had the best tools, but because they made sure that anyone could use them in a way a lot of open source tools aren’t.

    • jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      And generating those tools was easier when you can pay people to work full time on it; open source doesn’t pay nearly as well if at all.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      but making them easy enough for mass adoption

      In the attention economy, making them easy enough translates to making them addictive enough. I’ve been using a dumbphone for four years and every time someone asks about it, they say something like “I wish I could do that.”

      The thing people want is also what they hate.

    • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      And they did that because of loads of funding from those who understood the geopolitical power that comes from these tools and a willingness to accept massive spending and financial losses for decades, that normal investors wouldn’t touch, e.g. The US government. DARPA, NSF, DOD… funding

      E.g. The Internet, Google, Apple, Tesla etc…