YouTube is increasing Premium prices in multiple countries, right after an ad-blocker crackdown | You either pay rightfully for the video content you consume, or you live with the ads.::Google is increasing the prices of YouTube Premium and YouTube Music Premium subscriptions in some regions, right after blocking ad-blockers.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They seem to be increasing in frequency. If this is only the second one you’ve seen in the last 24h then you’re lucky.

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I have a question for people using sponsorblock. Why? How do you expect a content creator to pay the bills? I use an adblock because fuck Google but content creators pick up sponsorships specifically because YT pays like shit.

        • Beefy-Tootz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m only speaking for myself here, and I’m certain you’re not going to like the answer I have to offer. That’s not my problem. I don’t like being advertised to. I don’t like others telling me what I’ll like or what to do. I’m a monster, I know, I also take pee breaks when commercials come on tv as well and I usually arrive late to movies so I can skip the previews.

          Seriously though, I really don’t care how they pay their bills, they’re a dancing monkey on the sidewalk that I enjoy for a couple minutes and move on. If they can’t afford to keep making content and quit, I’ll just move onto the next channel that’s still producing. It’ll never run out, just like there’s always going to be someone who sits through the ads or actually buys whatever their shilling. At the end of the day, it’s their responsibility to make sure their shits handled, not mine. If they can’t pay their bills, they should probably do something that offers a more steady income stream.im not obligated to give them my time in exchange for them getting money. They get my time in exchange for me being entertained, that’s it. Maybe if they made content for enjoyment instead of money, they’d make better content.

          Before we get to name calling, I am fully aware that this is a shit take, but it’s the truth. I’m a cynic and I’m not very fun at parties either

          • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            10000% this. I don’t give a shit how you make money. YouTube started out as a place to let people show off to the world. It was wholesome. It was a community. Then they started paying people for views and it got perverted into this capitalist hellscape we have now where the most popular channels are garbage spewed out by content farms that exist to game an algorithm. Where the highest earners can commit literal crimes and get a slap on the wrist because Google wants the ad revenue their views bring in. This is not a community of the “you” the end users who just want to share interesting hobbies and funny clips with the world. Put the “you” back in YouTube.

            • Beefy-Tootz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Exactly!! I’ve been on the Internet for a long time. I remember the pre-youtube days. Way back when the Internet wasn’t exactly profitable. That meant that the content you found was genuinely made just to share something. I remember the early days of YouTube where people were just making cool shit. A good example, and I understand people have opinions that differ, would be RoosterTeeth. Started as just friends making funny shit, and they did separate shit for money to support making the fun stuff. Now, they’re a very different company owned by a mega corporation. They exist to produce favorable content and farm views. With the way that shit goes viral nowadays, there isn’t really a chance for small communities to exist before whatever space it is eventually explodes. I’m not saying small communities don’t exist, but there’s a big difference between what was and what’s become. Everything’s so much more commercial and purely for the intent of clout or money. People are actively trying to meet KPIs to satisfy arbitrary algorithms. Just go back to making entertaining captivating content.

        • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re already getting paid for putting it in their video. Sometimes the sponsorships are on a “per signups” basis and I have never once come across a YouTube sponsorship for something that I would actually have a use for. They’re either already getting paid or they weren’t getting my money anyway so I might as well skip it. I don’t need to hear a pitch for something I don’t want/need

        • Anemia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t care who’s serving the ads, I don’t want to watch ads period. I will pay for the content where possible though. I dont think youtube taking 45% considering the crazy infrastructure provided is that strange. Maybe 45% is still too much, but i don’t think 55% sounds like “shit”.

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I forgot that the people I watch are far less mainstream. They survive on Patreon and sponsorships because they’re constantly demonetized, thus my perception it pays shit.

            • Anemia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s fair enough. Didn’t think of that angle which is a pretty relevant one considering how easy it seems to be to get demonetized.

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            This didn’t help me, I understand advertising. My questioning sponsorblock apparently didn’t properly convey that a huge part of my confusion is that you can just… Skip that part. It’s not like rolled ads and even then I already mentioned support for adblocker.

            Like it’s overkill, obsessive type feel to me “I hate advertising so much I want everything to be automatic so I don’t even process for a 10th of a second that I may have consumed an ad” while most people are like “Oh it’s the sponsor” click click and move on. And hey maybe I see a it’s a product I DO use like Displate, so the discount code is useful.

            • Beefy-Tootz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Is the question “why automate when you can manually do it?” I think that’s where the confusion may lie. Why wouldn’t you automate it if you were going to do it anyway?

    • Docus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      +1 for yattee on IOS. Until we can get ublock origin on iphones, but that’s another story

  • Quik@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Or you update your uBlock Origin blocklists and declare YouTube the war.

        • billbasher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yep. I tried doing this with Hulu’s self-serving ads and I blocked enough domains that it just quit working

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Doesn’t work. I have network wide DNS filtering, but that alone doesn’t stop YT ads.

        If you have a link to a GitHub host file for that, I’d definitely take a peak.

        Otherwise, uBlock and *Pipe apps.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Try blocking the ads.
        You will block the video serving domains as well :)

        YT/Google aint that stupid and knows how to bundle both for your convenience.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I never see Vivaldi mentioned in these. Yes, it’s chromium based, but I have not seen a single YouTube ad since they implemented built-in ad block many years ago. Without the need for extensions, plug-ins, or user managed block lists.

      • Craton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        yeah, ive been using vivaldi and only very recently did i see my player diabled with ubo off but if i disable ubo and put vivaldi’s blocking option to just block trackers, that does the trick tho the ad starts with a black screen but the skip button instantly appears under .5 seconds or the video starts

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m willing to pay for content.

    I’m not willing to give Google money, or any proprietary solutions.

    I judge adverts to be a waste of limited human life. I hope that industry can change.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Aww. Are the greedy megacorporations upset that consumers are being greedy in return? Poor megacorporations. :c

  • dack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is why Google has been using their browser monopoly to push their “Web Integrity API”. If that gets adopted, they can fully control the client side and prevent all ad blocking.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thankfully, Firefox is still a thing. If that comes out, it’s going to be a hell of a lot more popular.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        … and dependent on Google ; they may either push that API into FF or push something different so bad that FF would lose even more users.

  • nl4real@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    11 months ago

    Still haven’t gotten any on Firefox with Ublock Origin. The usual explanation is that it rolls out in stages, but I’ve nothing weeks later.

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah there was an article that said that it’s fully deployed now.

      Your ad block solution must be filtering it out appropriately.

      I’ve had to do the full purge and refresh filters thing.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      I just have all my YouTube subscriptions feeding into an RSS feed. Haven’t gotten a single ad.

        • Gunpachi@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You can use a rss reader app that works on the desktop like Fluent Reader or if you want to go all out - setup something like freshrss / miniflux on a selfhosted server.

          As for getting Rss feeds from Youtube. I think there are some browser extensions you can use. If you have the newpipe app on android , you can visit any Youtube channel and it will have an option to get the Rss feed on the top right. You can copy that link to your RSS reader and it will start showing new videos.

  • a rose for me @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I will never watch 20 ads in a 15 minutes video, it’s worse than television.

    Make it a reasonable number of ads and I might consider it

    Some youtubers are so greedy it’s unreal, you barely see the red line because it’s way too filled with yellow spaces

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Kinda glad my uBlock Origin is still working.

    This should be illegal, actually in Europe it’s about to be…

  • daniskarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    If some day I cannot block ads on YouTube I’ll go to Patreon or any other platform that gives creators a real share of what I’m paying. Google will not see my money.

    • Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Has YouTube even done anything to improve the platform in the last 8 year? The only thing that I’ve seen change is the search turning to trash with “recommended content” after 4 real search results.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          And they did it in a way so half-ass that if you have the right plug in the dislike button is back. I think the most pathetic is when I see that the dislike button is turned off by the owner of the video.

          I understand why they did it, they were tired of major corporations having PR nightmares when trailers for unpopular products get downloaded into Oblivion, but protecting shareholders of other companies should not be their job. Their priority should be to content creators, sadly however this is how ethics works, not capitalism.

          But, being able to turn off the dislike button all together…

          Imagine every other job getting to do that, I am a janitor, imagine if one day I was allowed to have people just not be able to look at the dirt on whatever floor I didn’t mop. I would basically never mop again.

          I understand that YouTube is a hobby for most, at least it was in the beginning, but it is now a business. And if I were the Better Business Bureau I would give them a big fat F on their report card

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            To be clear, the plugin doesn’t make the button come back, the button never went away. The dislike counter went away, and the plugin doesn’t “bring it back” it simply approximates the number of dislikes (unless the channel operator opts in to having the info shared directly from their API, which comes with some security risks.)

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        No.

        In fact they’ve made it objectively worse by restricting what you’re allowed to make videos about.

        The state of True Crime is abysmal… it has gotten to the point where censorship is stricter than Cable TV, as the names of various felonies have to be bleeped out in order to not catch youtube’s wrath.

        Yet Far Right Political Channels are free to drop whatever slurs against transfolk they like… and openly accuse whatever drag performer they want of being a kiddie diddler even though true crime channels get a content strike for saying “pedophile” even though it’s in the context of someone literally tried and convicted as one.

        Ever wonder why the kids are saying “Unalive” so much? It started as a cute 4th wall leaning cover for death in a Deadpool/Spider-Man crossover…

        Now it has regular usage because direct references to death (Again, Regardless of context) is against Youtube Terms of Service.

        It’s so bad that a close friend of mine who is a streamer, despite not posting to youtube, has had to train himself to exclusively say Unalived so that clips of his streams can be safely posted to youtube, his livelihood cannot risk him using the “d” or “k” words.

        It’s absurd because a reason web content became so popular is that it wasn’t restricted to the same kind of censorship the FCC puts on Cable TV… We can have an Angry Nerd drop as many F Bombs as he wants while talking about something as innocuous as Super Mario 3…

        But thanks to Youtube… not anymore

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            They want to look like they’re against bigotry, but don’t actually wanna be…

            Shit just watch SML, it gets censored by Youtube all the time for incredibly minor shit (Like a parody of Momo, or showing blood), but the blatant transphobia and racism? Perfectly fine… I mean it’s comedy and nothing’s meant by it (Unlike the Starfield video)

            God, now I’m remembering all the people who used Kung Jin as a Fatality Dummy in MKX, which became a trend when the writer revealed Kung Jin was gay… (The game said he had a “forbidden romance”, but he’s a monk, so that could have easily been a woman since monk’s are celibate, which is why a writer had to clarify)

            What really sucks is all the “fans” whining that this was shoving Kung Jin’s sexuality in the face of the fans…

            This is the same game where Shinnok, the MK Devil, is threatening to end all existence, and right when his right hand man Quan Chi is in custody so that he can potentially bring the cast of the previous game back to life… but wait, can’t talk about that now, because Johnny Cage and Sonya Blade have to bring the whole game to a halt to scream at each other about their failed marriage…

            But it’s KUNG JIN’s sexuality that fucks up the game right? Strangely it’s never the straight people bringing the show to a halt to talk about how “Penis will touch vagina in a big and exciting way” who get accused of “Shoving their sexuality in people’s faces”, even though that shit happens all the time.

            Look Hollywood, your action movies don’t need a forced romance, especially if it’s a woman who will be competent in the first fucking scene and be a dumbass every other scene.

            Not really a problem MK has (Female Representation is in a pretty good place), but a beef I had in general.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Probably a lot on the backend. Honestly fewer changes on the front is probably for the better at this point.

    • AliceTheMinotaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Only issue would be getting the creators to move. That nay be more difficult than said with some. I already follow some on rumble, I only stay on YouTube as others haven’t.

      Otherwise I agree

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I was under the impression that YT Premium paid creators the same per view as YT with ads. Is this not the case?

      • Stephen304@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I believe Louis Rossmann said that giving a single dollar directly to a creator is more than a lifetime of watching their ads. Premium I think is really good comparatively but that’s only because ads pay so little.

        (https://youtu.be/4Q3ZXQZZlcE?t=55 is where he says this according to his cpm)

      • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Some creators have said that the cut they get from premium viewers is higher than that of ad based (SpiffingBrit for example, in his YouTube download exploit video).

        If that still holds true is unknown.

        • Raxiel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Linus (LTT) also said that one premium view was worth significantly more than ad based.

      • theRealBassist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t believe so. As I understand it, all Premium money goes into a big bucket. Then, views/watchtime/etc. are used to calculate what percentage of the pie a given creator will receive.

    • coffeewithalex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because it costs nothing to run data centers, employ thousands of people, distribute exabytes of data.

  • Xero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    uBlock Origin and ReVanced users: I missed the part where that’s my problem.

    • coffeewithalex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do you feel better after making fun of people who use other devices and not just a smartphone and browser? There are a hundred news that aren’t your problem and you don’t comment there, but you make sure to come in here and “rub it in” to people who care about this, by not providing an actual solution.

      Very noble.

        • coffeewithalex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Umm, actually it did. The solution to a problem is to first acknowledge it. The problem is being an asshole that can’t let a day go by without rubbing something in.

          The YouTube problem? For me it’s not a problem any more than anything else price-related. It’s interesting to see who is affected by the change and whether it impacts actual customers. What’s not interesting is seeing a long string of whinging and schadenfreude from people who strongly believe that it’s wrong to pay for services and who have not spent a cent on this. That’s ok, believe what you want, but don’t be an asshole about it.

      • EurekaStockade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sucks for them. This is what happens when you buy into the corporate, locked down, sanitised and monetised walled garden.

        Privacy first and FLOSS software have been out there the whole time for people willing to invest the time (and money, but often it’s cheaper than the commercial option) to learn them and gain those benefits for themselves.

        But if people want a device so they pick up the one with the shiniest marketing and then wonder why it’s shoving ads down their throat, well, that’s what they get for not researching the options. There are alternatives, they’ve been posted many times over in this thread and similar ones.

        • coffeewithalex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          So you’re openly hating on people for being normal, without offering a single alternative of a video platform that’s not all of those things that you labeled as evil.

          There are alternatives, they’ve been posted many times over in this thread and similar ones.

          The alternative to shopping isn’t shoplifting. The usual things that people list are client side apps that circumvent intended operation of the platform, reaping as many benefits without paying the cost. But hosting isn’t free. Running a business isn’t free. And hating the people who literally subsidize your unauthorized use of the platform is hypocrisy.