• latca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Paying for servers based off of the price of the food just doesn’t make sense to me. If I order a super expensive caviar and super expensive bottle of wine the staff would be paid more than another server with large party that only orders inexpensive drinks. The second server would be paid less for doing more work.

    I think they should just be paid a decent wage for doing their job well despite what the customer decided to order.

    On a side note if the server has to do something like prepare a salad table side or flambé a dessert they should get a bonus for doing that.

    • Okokimup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      11 months ago

      I worked as a server at olive garden many years ago. They famously had their soup, salad, and breadsticks deal for like $6 something. People would run us ragged getting more of each thing. And we’d be lucky to get a $1 or 2 because the price was so low, but it was vastly more work than regular food.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not going to the server, not unless the city has a minimum wage, or something. But any thing over that is 100% going to managment’s coffers.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yes. But some cities (or states, even,) specify another-higher minimum.

          Since you want to be pedantic… most cities don’t have a minimum wage established; deferring instead to federal or state law.