Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter’s links from its search results after the social network’s owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

“For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky,” Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

  • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Elon going to complain about another conspiracy going on while in reality it’s just that when crawlers are not able to open a certain URL they simply assume that the page doesn’t exist anymore. Google certainly didn’t “retaliate”, bots simply couldn’t find those pages anymore.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 years ago

      The headline is actually wrong. Google did not do anything to Twitter. Twitter fucked up their own SEO by removing access to its content.

    • bingbong@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      The latest in a seemingly never-ending series of self-owns. Apart from the stress it must put on their devs, it’s been entertaining

    • coffeetest@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Crawl issues I am sure but also user experience issues. Google is sensitive to sending visitors to sites where metrics indicate users do not, like bounce rates etc. I don’t use twt but if it is the case you have the be logged in to see anything now, a non-logged in user will click a link from Google hit a login page, and use the back button. I would assume Google will see that as a bad search result and use it less.

      • Pseu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        If I were making a web crawler, I would make it so that if a crawler finds a domain that appears to have changed dramatically or gone offline it will re-crawl the domain and flag already-crawled pages as potentially obsolete.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    Elon, please buy Reddit and repeat your amazing ideas over there. You are so smart.

    • WldFyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I saw people unironically saying this and being upvoted for it in hackernews, completely turned me off from the site lol

  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good. Hopefully they remove links to pinterest, quora and facebook too while they’reat it.

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Once upon a time Quora had reasonably accessible information. Now I find it nearly unusable and only go there as a last desperate effort which is generally fruitless. Pinterest is annoying, but generally you can still view some content. What’s annoying is trying to download, copy, or isolate content there. If all you want to do is view an image, Google can typically still pull the image out and make it viewable from the search. The problem only arises if you try to go in and see the original.

      • Tag365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, Quora was somewhat decent, but now they force this arbitrary “All related” sort as the default setting for presenting answers and it shows answers for different questions which is nonsense. I’m looking for an answer specific to one question, so don’t show me stuff that appears somewhat related…

    • allforthebest@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pinterest in search results is totally cringy, but by itself it’s a very good place to find images you need and has very cool recommendation algorithms.

    • Cras@feddit.uk
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have a chrome plugin to strip any Pinterest results from searches, it’s the absolute worst

    • Zithero@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Please remove Quora links…

      Every time I click a Quora link it takes me to a completely unrelated question to the one I clicked on.

      I swear that site is doing this deliberately to make it seem like it has more traffic than it does.

      • anonforker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        some cases with pinterest result is absolute garbage and might as well better to search on search engine image instead

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Doesn’t sound like retaliation to me, it sounds like their scheduled web crawlers are finding that content they used to index is now no longer viewable and this removed from search results. Pretty standard. My guess is that there were 400 million URLs listed and as the crawler uncovers that they are no longer available, that number will keep dropping to reflect only content publicly viewable. If only 500 URLs are now publicly viewable (without logins) then that’s what they will index. Google isn’t a search engine for private companies (unless you pay for the service) they are a public search engine so they make an effort to ensure that only public information is indexed. Some folk game the system (like the old expertsexchange.com) but sooner or later google drops the hammer.

      • agoramachina@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yup, I remember the absolute outrage when Ellen Pao became CEO of reddit, though it is nice at least to finally see her vindicated on there now. I hadn’t heard of the glass cliff until long after she left, but people have been referencing it left and right on reddit recently. Turns out, Ellen Pao wasn’t the problem…

        • FediFuckerFantastico@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah that’s crazy, I was furious when they fired Victoria back in the day. It’s nice to see that Alexis Ohanian is the one who deserves the blame for that massive fuckup. Man that gives me a pang of nostalgia for the old days of reddit though. Interesting that the Wiki article points to Obama’s presidency and the 08 financial collapse as a “glass cliff” event.

      • Deez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Thanks for sharing, I hadn’t heard of that expression or phenomenon.

      • Afiefh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Someone needs to make this Musk’s official title. Chief-Fuck-Upper. I also heard Chief-Twit circling around.

        Can we perhaps add a list of notable titles to his Wikipedia entry?

        • MartinXYZ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          “CFU of Twitter” does have a nice ring to it

          Then Spez could be CFU of Reddit. I kinda miss Ellen Pao. And Chooter.

          Edit: A word.

    • Gerowen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      She straight up admitted that she was essentially a sock puppet CEO and would offer no friction to anything Musk wanted.

      • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Musk is a manchild who can’t handle being told “no”, so that’s a given.

        But it’s smart of her to put that out in advance. It informs Musk that she will stay out of his way, and she doesn’t have to take the blame for idiotic decisions made by him.

    • nPrime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Both Musk and Huffman seem to think the E in CEO stands for “Enshittification.”

      Edit - typo

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      So this decision is solely because the results can no longer be viewed by non-logged-in users.

      Glad to see (semi) confirmation of this. It’s the same reason paywall news sites are magically not paywalled (or less paywalled) when coming from a Google search. If you’re showing Google something different than what you’re showing users, Google is going to remove or down rank your results.

      What makes this more “news-worthy” is that Google and Twitter have had a great relationship for many years and Twitter is typically among the top results (for some topics). Obviously Musk has been destroying that relationship over the past year.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, if the content is walled off from the public, there’s not much point indexing it

      It’s a shame it’s come to this, but there are literal crazy people at the helm over at Twitter…

        • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Would that fit with his own head cannon though?

          Elon has been a destroyer behind closed doors it’s sounds like, tough to say if it was just due to how pompous and narcissistic he is or if it was deliberate retaliation for being a whiny little spoiled brat.

  • bluestribute@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Has anyone noticed too that if you put AI Blockers on your website Google delists it from their search?

  • Rocket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s funny how Spez idolizes a guy who doesn’t pay his bills. It’s also funny watching the hate pplatform Twitter get absolutely destroyed by its owner. The internet in 2023 is a wild and crazily changing place.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      At this point I’m half convinced spez was such an asshole to Reddits users because of how the community turned on his idol elon. I remember not longer than two years ago Reddit was basically musk circlejerk but this genius fucked up even that.

      • bloopernova@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think it’s even stupider than that. Spez didn’t realize he pissed off the Apollo dev, and the shock of that first Apollo post made him ashamed and angry. He’s kept a lot of vitriol aimed at the Apollo dev. Spez fucked reddit because he got mad.

        • Redtitwhore@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          That was just the tipping point. Reddit has been in a decline for a few years but we were all like frogs in boiling water but we accepted it because we didn’t know where else to go. RIF shutting down forced my hand and now I’m here. Hopefully to stay.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Twitter was an important unifying communications tool during the Arab Spring. The Arab spring was a threat to biz as usual in places like Saudi Arabia. The second largest investor in Twitter is Saudi Arabia.

    Saudi Arabia killed and dismembered a journalist from the US, more or less in plain sight. Elon is now killing and dismembering Twitter in plain sight to limit its power as a unifying tool that stands as a demonstrable, active threat to capitalism and oligarchs around the world.

    Billionaires do favors for other billionaires. It’s part of why spez is trying to tank Reddit. Remember how dangerous Reddit was to capitalism’s status quo around the time of GME/Robinhood/Antiwork recently.

    The specific moment we’re in right now is meant to shatter consolidated organizing power on Reddit as we splinter into several smaller alternative platforms (or for some, disconnect entirely). Not saying we shouldn’t be in Lemmy, but calling out the larger reality of the moment.

    Billionaires do favors for other billionaires.

    • Dash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I like this take, but this is a conspiracy theory take. Change a few words and this would be something regurgitated by Q fanatics.

    • nparkinglot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m glad I’m not the only person thinking about this. I had no idea about the Saudis owning Twitter like that. All decisions made by the rich are for MoneyTM. Usually it’s MoneyTM in either the form of growth (profit, short term) or investment (power, stability, long term). Some of spezs actions are easily explained by MoneyTM when you take into account LLMs mining reddit. But that does not explain being so insanely hardline with their API. There was absolutely a resolution to that that was profitable and didn’t continue giving away “their” information for free. This is where I think a 3rd MoneyTM comes into play: existential investments. These are actions they take to ensure the other two forms of MoneyTM continue to function the way they want them to. Such as tanking the two most significant online tools for organizing collective action against them.

  • Raymend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Queue the person on the forums telling you that it’s your fault and not the search engine because somehow you’re doing it wrong.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    You’ve heard of a “walled garden”.
    But this… this has become a “walled right-wing dumpster”.