The world has experienced its hottest day on record, according to meteorologists.

The average global temperature reached 17.01C (62.62F) on Monday, according to the US National Centres for Environmental Prediction.

The figure surpasses the previous record of 16.92C (62.46F) - set back in August 2016.

  • traveler01@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    We thank people who disregarded nuclear energy. We could’ve sliced global emissions by a lot if were not for you, but burning coal is far safer.

    • AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I thank the oligarchs and their willing consumption enthusiasts. This apocalypse is brought to you by unchecked, insatiably greedy capitalists and capitalism.

      • traveler01@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        41
        ·
        2 years ago

        This apocalypse is brough to you by unchecked, insatiably greedy capitalists and capitalism.

        Most environmental solutions are also being created in capitalist societies, and the richest countries (which by coincidence are capitalist) are the ones that are decreasing their emissions by a considerable amount.

        Connecting capitalism to environmental changes is just communist propaganda, dunno if you did it willingly or not but that’s about it.

        • Sparlock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Way to minimise the last 40-50 years of capitalists actively working to stop any real progress on climate change. Sure progress is being made now after they figured out it was getting bad and there was money to be made in green tech. That doesn’t excuse the decades of lobbying and and actual propaganda put out by capital interests that we are all paying for now.

          That you are spouting off about “communist propaganda” tells me you either grew up in the 80’s and really bought the red scare line or you bought the far right propaganda telling you to be scared of ‘CHI-NAH’ (to quote the orange traitor).

            • Sparlock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              “You couldn’t far wronger in this question lol”

              Sure. I couldn’t “far wronger”.
              What a thoughtful and fact filled reply that furthers conversation.

              Try making a point or defending your position if you want to be taken at all seriously.
              As it stands why should anyone think you might be correct in your statements and not just dismiss you out of hand as a moron who is far wronger?

              • traveler01@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                25
                ·
                2 years ago

                First, in the 80s I wasn’t even born and if the fact I don’t fall for every bull**** communist propaganda that I read in the internet makes you upset, boho I’m so sorry.

                Blaming the environmental changes on capitalism it’s like calling “The Radium Girls” dumb. During the latest decades they didn’t know very well about the damages they were causing but if you check history, as soon as there was scientific evidence that something was causing harm, laws were passed in capitalist countries to remove it promptly. Look at the lead in petrol debacle, CBDs, the CFCs.

                Also, even today there’s really not a good way of replacing “dirty” technologies like jet engines. Of course, the communist countries aren’t doing sh*t to solve the issue either, they’re even making it worse.

                • zysarus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Exxon has known the damage they were causing since at least the 80s and have spent absurd amounts of money alongside their competitors lobbying governments and paying scientists to keep the status quo. We had at least some evidence that burning fossil fuels was going to cause global warming at the turn of the 20th century.

                  What you’re saying isn’t entirely false, but it sure is bending over backwards to be nice to the capitalist societies that caused this problem. Also there aren’t any communist countries causing this problem, China is every bit as capitalist as the US in how their economy functions these days, they’re communist in name only. You’ve been influenced by capitalist propaganda friend.

                  • traveler01@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    What you’re saying isn’t entirely false, but it sure is bending over backwards to be nice to the capitalist societies that caused this problem.

                    Humanity caused this problem, not capitalism. It’s not like commies never burn CO2 to keep things running.

                    Again oil companies will always protect their businesses at all costs, specially since they invested billions into exploring new oil sources. If governments are letting themselves being so influenced by lobbies, the problem isn’t capitalism, it’s the politicians.

                • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  laws were passed in capitalist countries to remove it promptly

                  Promptly on what timescale? Geological?

                  It’s always too little too late. If it wasn’t, we wouldn’t be in this mess. Reality speaks for itself.

                  • traveler01@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    CFOs, lead on petrol were removed pretty fast considering the scale of usage being done. Lowering CO2 emissions will be much harder though since it’s required to replace technologies we’ve been using for decades.

                    The fact there’s so much lobbying against nuclear it’s very retarded since we could’ve lowered emissions by a lot if were not for these people. And again, the loudest opposition isn’t even capitalist, some are more leaning left and even call themselves “environmentalists”.

                • Sparlock@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Holy shit you are delusional if you believe any of that. A simple google search on climate science coverup by fossil fuel companies (like Exxon, Shell, and BP) in the 70’s is just a single example and it would take you almost no effort to learn. That you haven’t even done the very LEAST you could to not be embarrassingly wrong, should serve to let anyone reading anything you comment on to simply dismiss your ramblings as misleading at best.

                  You need to take a look in the mirror and ask yourself if maybe you got this wrong since myself and MANY others have pointed out the various things you are just factually incorrect on.

                  I’m not holding out hope though, I am willing to bet you will just double down in your fantasy instead of facing reality. Feel free to prove me wrong, little would please me more.

                • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  There’s actually a news article from the March 1912 edition of Popular Mechanics warning about how ‘the furnaces of the world’ are ‘burning about 2,000,000,000 tons of coal a year’, and how ‘when this is burned, united with oxygen, it adds about 7,000,000,000 tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere yearly.’ They conclude that adding 7 billion tons of CO2 per year ‘make(s) the air a more effective blanket for the earth and raise its temperature’ and that ‘the effect may be considerable in a few centuries’. Their only mistake was underestimating how much CO2 future generations would put in the atmosphere. They estimated a few centuries for 7 billion tons of CO2. I’m wondering what they’d make of 43 billion tons.

                  Capitalists ignored the clear warnings from scientists about pumping CO2 into the atmosphere for over a century because it wasn’t economical for them to do something about it. It was always somebody else’s problem. Until it wasn’t. Where do you live? New York, that has recently had some of the worst air quality in history thanks to Canadian wildfires? Or Denver, where it was our turn in April and May? Or when we got the horrible DECEMBER wildfire that burned into Boulder? Man, wildfires in fucking December. NOW it’s fashionable for Capitalists to at least pretend to care about the environment, but shit, if there could be a dollar made burning down the last forest, you fucking better believe that capitalists will gleefully play a Captain Planet villain while they do just that.

                  Edit: A fun link: https://bigthink.com/the-present/1912-climate-change-prediction/

                  • Sparlock@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    That dude is impervious to facts.

                    He wants to blame it all in Commies or some other harebrained idea.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Most environmental solutions are also being created in capitalist societies, and the richest countries (which by coincidence are capitalist) are the ones that are decreasing their emissions by a considerable amount.

          Only because those capitalists societies are offloading the work that generates those emissions on to poorer countries because it’s cheaper to do it there.

          • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes, the German method. We lower our emissions not by using nuclear power, but by moving our coal outside of EEA and buying it back at 5x the price!

          • traveler01@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            We will be able to decrease emissions, never get them to 0. Hence maybe some CO2 extraction will be needed.

          • traveler01@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Only because those capitalists societies are offloading the work that generates those emissions on to poorer countries because it’s cheaper to do it there.

            It’s cheaper and most importantly they allow it. These countries want growth, they want to attract investment, have work for the people. It’s a win-win relationship otherwise these countries wouldn’t allow it.

        • AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I take no offense to being called a communist, even though I’m a socialist. I have a great deal of pity for the sycophants of capitalism, though, cheering their own exploitation and oppression as their masters terraform the planet to be hostile towards human life in the name of quarterly profit expectations.

          Your family will be burning from the global oligarch’s fine work, and you’ll be blaming the invisible communists and socialists that countries like the US used military means to decimate through global destabilization the world over to further capitalist interests. The capitalists won, are fully in charge, and have captured their own regulatory bodies in most of the world. This is the world of capitalists own making. They run the show, we are living in what the capitalists would consider their utopia, where they live like modern Pharoahs as most of the species subsists to further enrich them.

          We crossed that threshold years ago, man made climate alteration is a runaway train of multigenerational suffering at best, and possibly the end of human civilization for ages at worst. Have fun cursing the dirty commies when you’re thirsty with no recourse 🤣

      • SageWaterDragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        God, that’s so depressing. I genuinely don’t understand how we - any of us, in any country - are supposed to be okay with these political mechanisms filled with incompetent, out-of-touch, self-interested codgers. I’m not willing to take action, but when our entire world is being picked apart by the public sector and sold for parts by the private sector, what are we to do?

        • seejur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Lobbies. The German “green” party if fully funded by Russia, which has a vested interest in keeping coal, but especially nat gas (which despite the CO2 emission is still labelled as “green”) being the primary source of energy.

          • SageWaterDragon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            While lobbies are extremely powerful, I don’t understand how I, personally, am supposed to support the lobbies that represent my interests. Donating to PACs? I’m just not wealthy enough to make it make sense.

            • seejur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think its a bit too late for that. 40% of wealth is owned by the top 1%, and even if the remaining 99% own 60, most of that wealth is not available, but used for everyday necessities. So no, you cant outbid our out PAC billionaires anymore. Too much trickle up economy has been going on for too many years

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      We thank people who disregarded nuclear energy.

      Do you really think governments actually gave a shit about some deluded hippies? Nah, they were just the scapegoats the politicians used to pretend they weren’t in bed with the fossil fuel lobbyists.