When faced with an unexpected $1,000 expense, more than one-third of Americans would borrow the money, according to a new Bankrate survey. That may include tapping their credit cards, seeking money from friends or family or taking out a personal loan.

Most would not turn to cash savings because they don’t have it, the personal finance website found.

Fewer than half of Americans, 44%, say they can afford to pay a $1,000 emergency expense from their savings, according to Bankrate’s survey of more than 1,000 respondents conducted in December.

That is up from 43% in 2023, yet level when compared to 2022.

“We’re just not wired to save,” said Brad Klontz, a certified financial planner and expert in financial psychology and behavioral finance. Our brains are instead programmed to focus on our immediate needs.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “we’re not wired to save” is a weird way of saying 44% 56% of Americans barely make it paycheck to paycheck with no disposable income.

    Edit: wrong percentage

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s propaganda to make you blame yourself for being essentially indentured.

        • ferret@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 years ago

          Doesn’t change the fact that such a wage barely covers rent and food for someone with no dependents

        • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You need to check what the purchasing power parity between US and your country is.

          Someone making 35K USD per year in USA is doing roughly as well as someone making 15.3K USD per year in Lithuania. That’s a higher end retail wage here, or 1170 euros.

          I make more than that after taxes, and that includes national health insurance and national pension fund.

          The caveats are that plane travel, vehicles and electronics will be more expensive to a Lithuanian but fresh food, real estate, rent and services will be more expensive to an American.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is a spending problem. I know people who make $500k/year who live paycheck to paycheck. I know other people who make $35k/year who have money left at the end of the month (not $1000).

      Now i will grant it is a lot easier to live on 500k than 35k, and a lot easier to save. However living paycheck to paycheck doesn’t tell us anything.

      • Overzeetop@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        “live paycheck to paycheck.”

        That may be generally true, but they likely have a bunch of equity in their homes, and I’ll bet their retirement accounts are generous. Sure, there are some who just spend everything, but most people at that level are already “hiding” as much money as they can from taxes.

          • bluGill@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            What do you mean by own? Own as in 100% paid for - not too many. Own as in their name is on the deed, but most of the value belongs to the bank - more than half of the US.

              • Overzeetop@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Their names are on the titles, they own the homes. Their banks - the mortgage lenders - hold a rights to a lien placed on the property, but they have no title to the property unless they enforce the terms of their lending contract in the event of default.

                The owners making 500k may very well be just a few months from foreclosure if they lose their job, but they likely have at least 20% (likely much more unless they bought at a premium two years ago) equity and can probably salvage at least half - even after fees - if they were to become “destitute” and undertook a regular sale of the property. 10% of a million dollars (or more), for most of the country, is still a healthy sum of money.

            • meco03211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              But they own portions of it. It isn’t like it’s 100% the bank’s house until the last payment is made. You build equity that is in fact yours. And in the last decade you could have made a killing if you’d bought a house at the right time. We sold a house last year for almost twice what we paid for it 7 years before. The bank doesn’t get any of that extra money.