• gila@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      121
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think it’s a reference to the Stanley cup craze and subsequent tiktok posting about bioavailable lead in damaged ones

      • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That sounds incredibly stupid. What kind of testing was done to suggest this? Surely the FDA would have a thing or two to say about it.

        • gila@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          IIRC it’s a part of the vacuum-sealed thermal insulation of the cup, which is covered by stainless steel. So it’s fairly resistant to damage, they do a lifetime warranty, and if the seal is broken, the thermally insulating function of the bottle is compromised anyway. I guess that’s enough for the FDA? Obviously ideally you’d just prefer no lead at all? It was apparently charcoal until 2008.

          • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ah yeah, I’m seeing people saying it’s the solder joining some internal parts together, so that’s a total non-issue. But still… this is the one place where I wouldn’t defend leaded solder over the leadless alternatives.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        I do and I haven’t! But I tested my paint chips… I guess they’re sweet for some other reason :'(