• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Touche…

      Pour one out for project Ara, everyone… And the hundreds of other companies that had a bright future before Google bought and destroyed them.

    • Shadesto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google made a huge mistake shutting down Google+. If they had built it out to integrate with Youtube, where people could have a space to Tweet, have a Main Page feed like Facebook, and post videos all in the same platform, they would have dominated the market.

      I still have a hard time believing that no-one has created a platform that encompasses all of those things. Meta is doing it piece-meal but it’s all disorganized. It should be one unified platform.

      That’s why I hope some developers start working on a way to integrate Lemmy and Mastodon and like… PeerTube together into a single frontend. I’d love to be able to manage my Mastodon posts and BS on Lemmy in the same website.

  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In 12 years, selfhosting will be so cheap and one-push-button easy that everyone will have their own instance and federated with each other. It will be called Neo-Geocities 2.0.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’ve been running around the Fediverse for two years now and the name has yet to grow on me. Makes it slightly difficult to explain to people who are interested. The “iverse” part makes it sound like a metaverse type project which gives some people pause -because of the hype-flop cycle and, of course, all the crypto scams associated with that. Have to begin the pitch with “but it has nothing to do with [that], so don’t worry.” (Edit because autocorrect)

    • Flat Pluto Society@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should’ve called it Google Circles. Google Plus just sounded like some kind of premium subscription to Google and not like a social network.

    • Therevev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a huge motorhead fan. The name is a not insignificant part of why I chose this as a reddit alternative over the others

  • dunestorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why you should never adopt Google services, there’s a high chance they will kill it off given their awful track record.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the biggest miss Google had was with Google Wave. It was way ahead of its time, and absolutely crashed and burned at launch because of the invite-only model.

      I bought a Google OnHub router, which was amazing. It was marketed as the most “future-proof” router at the time. Then Google made Google WiFi mesh routers around a year later, and OnHub was never marketed or mentioned again. Now, in addition to my already concerning privacy issues around Google services, I don’t trust that they will release quality, supported products.

      • FightMilk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I started reading your comment and thought “please be about Wave” haha. The funniest part about Wave is how they learned no lessons from it.

        The invite-only model worked great for Gmail because it was an actual service with real utility and people wanted in (1GB storage was huuuuge). But with social networks, the courting ritual is reversed, because without a critical mass of users the product has no utility.

        So what do they do with G+? Invite only 🤦‍♂️

        And by then they had something like half the world running Android, with Google accounts… and didn’t just let them in. Youtube should have been a simple “if you want to check out G+, your Youtube account will get you in, otherwise carry on.” Instead they make it invite only and then bully youtubers into registering.

        It’s just mind-boggling how little they understood about social networks after building such a wonderful piece of software for it.

          • Hackwork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I threw mine in the trash in less than a month, didn’t even bother trying to resell it and just wanted it gone. What a pile of fucking shit that thing was. I spent more time troubleshooting than watching.

    • 👽🍻👽@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is extremely interesting. So many products that I’ve never heard of and many of them were actually around for 6-12 years before being axed or coming up on death soon. A lot of these I had heard of and even used occasionally over the years and I didn’t realize were gone now.

      • Nyanix@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s amazing how many cool projects they’ve funded the creation of, but never really advertised, and subsequently killed

    • joystick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, so many products I didn’t realize were dead. I remember when they were pushing Duo.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      2017 - 2023

      Service

      YouTube Stories

      Killed 15 days ago, YouTube Stories (originally YouTube Reels) allowed creators to post temporary videos that would expire after seven days. It was over 5 years old.

      I found one I’m happy about. Good riddance!

  • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The beauty of the Fediverse is that no single entity controls it… In 12 years, I’d wager we’re still around.

    • elkaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would wager most of nowadays instances have either fallen into obscurity or just finished existing, I think we will see instancea more focused in scalability if thr fediverse grows in popularity, whoch will kind of dominate the space.

        • elkaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I had to guess for a few I would say beehaw and lemm.ee will also still be alive in some way or another, but I dont think they will keep being as big in proportion to other instances as they are now.

      • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        With open source and interoperability, this is a good thing, because then you can choose the experience you wanna have. You’re not bound to a single vendor-locked platform that’s subject to continuity issues or a degraded experience that forces you to move elsewhere and start over in terms of following/followers. You simply pack up and migrate to another instance.

  • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I kind of feel like a single Lemmy instance will domonate dominate and become the defacto instance that everyone just joins.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think that’s against the plan with Lemmy and distributed instances, but they can improve sign up, and make it possible to migrate your user between instances, or do some unique username across all instances.

      A cool feature would also be that a user could backup all their posts and votes.

    • qzdyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I enjoyed it as well. It was pretty cool. Then I became busy with other stuff and one day I heard the news that G+ would be shut down.

      • figaro@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If only you stayed active on it, Google wouldn’t have shut it down.

        Kidding lol. I used it too, it was pretty sweet. It felt like a mix of Twitter and Tumblr.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was a pretty cool platform but their biggest problem was making it invite only, therefore forcing it to be smaller than competing platforms. Invite only may work for Gmail but not for social media.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also enjoyed Google+. I liked the app and the interface. The content was pretty good for a bit.

    • dimlo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t really know what is the problem with google+ except they are born in the wrong time where Facebook are still on the rise, instagram is new and trendy and Zuckerberg is not dreaming on metaverse

      • Gazumbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of the things that probably killed it was Google enforcing people to use their real names on there. Which of course affected also commenting on YouTube as well.

        I quite liked Google+ overall. Would have been good to have a proper competitor to Facebook.

    • malloc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What did you like about it? It was basic af from what I remember. It was a FB clone, at best.

      • Gazumbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of its plus points (no pun intended) was that it was the first social media platform to allow more granular control over who saw your posts. You could people to ‘circles’ and limit posts to which ever circles of friends you selected (if I’m remembering this correctly).

        I think at that time on Facebook, you only had the option of Public, Friends or Private. It spurred Facebook on to introduce more granular control as well. So if nothing else, Google+ was good for that.

  • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only place I’ve ever accidentally uploaded a dick pic and so glad I had like 2 friends on there who never checked lol. It was a fun 2 weeks.

    • aquarisces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol are you sure it was an accident or did it only become an accident when your 2 friends didn’t look 😜

  • samokosik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I honestly hope lemmy will not die. It will have to become simpler though. For many people, it will be simply way too complicated to wrap their head around the fact of many instances and most of them will worry about not being able to interact with people from other instances.

    Also, the main lemmy web app is not necessarily good and alternatives such as wefwef are far easier to use.

    • Deuces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We just need to be better about simplifying the explanation. Don’t tell people “it’s a federated website using an activitypub backend to communicate like mastodon, but only links to federated lemmys not including mastodon instances…” Tell them “it’s a fourm that shares posts and comments with other fourms that agree to work together”. If they want more detail they can easily find it themselves.

      • DSX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like the explanation using email as an example works pretty well. Most people understand how different emails from different providers can communicate, but their account is hosted on one platform.

        • narF@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Even better is to talk about phone carriers, because people seem to know those better than emails these days. “Just because your phone is using Carrier A doesn’t mean you can’t call your friends on Carriers B and C”

      • fkn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Significantly. If you are used to the UI it is a very fast experience. The learning curve can be a bit sharp unfortunately.

  • MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google+ didn’t work because they didn’t push it hard enough and they made it an invite only beta instead of just allowing everyone to join.

    Yes - I’m being serious they didn’t push it hard enough. If you had a Gmail or YouTube account it should have just instantly become a Google+ account in some sort of private mode so it doesn’t inadvertently leak your info.

    If they would have just pushed it out to everyone, day one, mandatory, no opt out, then we’d still have Google+ today.

    Like if they made Google Talk the default messaging client on Android we’d still have Google Talk. I don’t recall Apple making iMessage an optional messaging app you don’t have to use.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolute truth. I was onboard with G+ early. I handed out invites to everyone I could. I pushed my spouse to use it. Ultimately what killed it was it being invite-only, and mainly only tech enthusiasts were on the site initially. When other people got invited by them, and the newer users didn’t see their friends and family on the site, they just left and never revisited it. That was my experience anyways. The model Threads used will be the model that all large social media sites use to roll out new social media products, it just makes the most sense.

    • 🇦🇺Baku@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, the whole reason I refused to use it WAS because they forced it on me so hard. Being forced into having one of you wanted to watch YouTube did my head in and I refused to use it. Same reason I don’t use Microsoft edge even though it’s a little less shit now

    • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They started out like that, but then they tried to force it down everybody’s throats and it backfired. It was mismanaged from start to finish, which is a shame because it really was good despite Vic Gundotra.

    • Ktheone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nah dude, there’s no way that would have worked, the reason why g + backfired was literally because everyone on yt was forced to make a g account to just comment.

      • Anaphylactic_Gock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think you misunderstand what they’re saying. You shouldn’t have had to make an account. G+ should’ve just been a part of your existing Google account.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they would have just pushed it out to everyone, day one, mandatory, no opt out, then we’d still have Google+ today.

      Is this comment for real, or sarcasm? Did the upvoters forget about Google Buzz already?

  • BeezKnuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean this post has 1200 upvotes. Considering most people don’t engage with the voting system that makes me think that there’s a decent amount of people here. At the very least it means there’s a lot of people here who engage with the community. More come every day. If this post were on Reddit, it would be on r/all right now. That’s not bad for a community with a fraction of the users.

    I think that in 10 years this place will be doing alright. I think the growth that’s happened in the last few months won’t last, but I think that growth will still steadily happen. The reddexodus doesn’t happen every day but with most social media platforms shitting their geriatric pants more and more lately, I think a consistent flow of refugees will come here.