• MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    Apple cites security concerns for killing PWAs in europe. I mean they could‘ve made changes to the system to allow running PWAs in other browser engines by offering an API in which other applications could hook themselves into, akin to how Android did it with the web activity that is used by other apps.

    But then that would mean conceding to the EU and we can‘t have that, can we?

  • deluxeparrot@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I understood it as a technical limitation imposed by the changes Europe are demanding. They now have to allow different browser engines, so they can’t just use Safari under the hood for PWAs. They will need some UI and the technical underpinning to allow the browser engine to be selected.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    They aren’t killing PWAs. They’re simply removing them from the home screen. Nothing about this will interfere with the ability to load and operate PWAs.

    • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Apple’s implementation of other PWA standards requires an app to be opened from the home screen. A user can’t access features of the app if they can’t add it to the homescreen.

      • gayhitler420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s the social engineering aspect of insecurity on pwas.

        I’m genuinely baffled by this comment section.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    No, it will kill PWAs. And since Apple dictates what everyone else does, this also automatically means PWAs are dead on Android, too. It’ll probably get prevented system-side in the future no matter which browser you use, they’ll find a way.

      • Vincent@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        A big benefit is writing the app once and it working everywhere. If it only works on Android, people will just default to the tools tailored to that platform anyway.

          • Vincent@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That’s theoretically true, but in practice, the desktop experience (screen size, interaction model, etc.) is sufficiently different that adapting it to mobile to get an app-like experience is not that different from building a separate app.

              • Vincent@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Then why do you think most business are already writing a separate Android app rather than just optimising their mobile website?

                But “make the mobile version not take up as much screen-space” is not as simple as simply zooming out and just hiding some icon labels. And just the fact that people interact by touch rather than with a mouse and keyboard is already a major adjustment.

                Anyway, I’ll leave it at this, since I feel like there’s not much to gain here for me from the discussion anymore :) Cheers!

                • why do you think most business are already writing a separate Android app

                  I don’t think that. I know some businesses who are still writing separate apps, instead of switching to cross-platform. You’ll have to ask them why they’re doing that. It frustrates me no end when platform-specific bugs come up because they’re running different code on each platform, each written by different people.

                  the fact that people interact by touch rather than with a mouse and keyboard

                  …makes no difference at all. Whether a user has touched a button, clicked on it, or tabbed to it and pressed enter, the same Button.Clicked event gets triggered.

      • Matty_r@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Like it or not, Apple is the trend setter. Everybody feels like they need to do what Apple does. So given that, Apple kills PWAs, everyone else will surely follow.

        That’s normally how it goes anyway.

        • parens@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hmm… OK. Not sure you’re right in this instance. PWAs have been shit on iPhones for ages due to everything being forced to use Safari on that platform. Probably less people use PWAs on iPhone than on Android. Most people probably didn’t even know of PWAs (as seen right in this comment section in a tech community).

  • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    The title appears to be quite the reach. If Apple wanted to kill PWA’s, they would have done so worldwide. There is absolutely nothing preventing them from disabling them in the US and Canada (and much of the rest of the world) today, but they haven’t — they’re only disabling them in the EU.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Arbitrarily and suddenly destroying all apps built with a certain tech stack, throughout all of Europe will have a knock on effect for that tech stack that will drive less investment in it for every single European company and every multinational that even sometimes operates there.

      Apple is being an absolute piece of shit if they go through with this, I will never buy one of their products again if they do. They’re a trillion dollar company acting like a petulent child because they were forced to be ever so slightly less monopolistic, they’re acting like huge pieces of shit.

      • TechNom (nobody)@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re a trillion dollar company acting like a petulent child

        No. They’re a trillion dollar company acting like a greedy dirty scum that they are.

      • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Arbitrarily and suddenly destroying all apps built with a certain tech stack…

        Except they aren’t. Sure, PWAs may be slightly more disadvantaged on iOS/iPadOS than they are now, but they haven’t been “destroyed”. And they continue to work exactly as they did with the prior iOS/iPadOS release in all the rest of the world.

        Everyone seems to think Apple is playing some sort of 4D Chess to kill off PWAs — but if Apple wanted to kill off PWAs they could just disable the functionality completely globally tomorrow, and they’d likely face no repercussions for doing so. They don’t even need an excuse to do so.

        I’m not claiming that Apple is acting honourably here; merely that if they actually wanted to kill PWAs it wouldn’t require some sort of Rube Goldberg machine-style planning to do it. There is no conspiracy here.